Philpy67 Wrote:
Apr 18, 2012 10:13 AM
We have a candidate who has supported and defended liberty, limited gov't, the Constitution, and founding principles like a Pit Bull for 30 years in Ron Paul. He is dismissed by so-called "conservatives" because he opposes unConstitutional, damaging, and originally-progressive interventionism/world policing. For folks like Rush, Hannity, Prager, Medved, Hewitt, etc., a nanny state at home is unacceptable, but a nanny-to-the-world foreign policy is so important that we are willing to allow liberty and prosperity at home to be jeopardized. Anyone who claims to support liberty, limted gov't, the Constitution, and founding principles, but dismisses Ron Paul will have to accept responsibility for failing to choose the solution to the problem.