Seriously?? I expect this kind of bias from the mainstream media, but why is TH hopping onboard the "ignore Ron Paul bandwagon". Article is titled "Mitt, Rick, and Newt", as if Rich Galen thinks Ron Paul is irrelavant. His only mention of Paul is that Newt came in fourth behind Paul. Seriously?? You give play to the one in LAST place and the one who quit, but ignore the only real alternative to Mitt. Galen, you do a grave injustice to the American population and to journalism.