In response to:

Video: Axelrod Refuses to Say Whether Obama Held Security Meeting After Benghazi Attack

UnionizeSovietizeAdvance Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 9:49 PM
1992: ConservaTURDS whine, "We would've won if it weren't for Perot!" 1996: " " 2000: ConservaTURDS ignore blatant cheating and the scotus giving the election to Bush. 2004: ConservaTURDS ignore blatant cheating. 2008: ConservaTURDS whine about the "librul media". 2012: " "
algae Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 9:59 PM
Voter ID? - Never quoth the libtroll! Every vote for our lackey should count..... at least twice.
Ken6226 Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 9:52 PM
2012: Liberals again whine about "blatant cheating" like they did in 2000 and 2004.
John Bull Wrote: Oct 15, 2012 9:52 PM
ROFLOL...
Said the idooot in the crowd...
Wait a second, I thought you libtard and commies just didn't believe in blatant cheating...
Oh wait, Stalin said do it and always blame it on the other side... You commies never change..

HAHHAH

It's clear that this isn't a case of Axelrod not knowing the answer to Chris Wallace's question.  This is a case of Axelrod trying to side-step the question, the accurate response to which is "no."  We saw reports that Obama neglected his intel briefing the day after the 9/11 Benghazi massacre; now Axe has essentially confirmed that the president didn't hold any meeting with his security team prior to jetting over to Vegas for a campaign stop on September 12: