Loyal Democrat Wrote: 51 minutes ago (6:37 AM)
"As far as harming the children of those parents who happened to break the law, we cannot let such an action stand.
This would be akin to a case where a bank robber made a major haul of cash, thereby advancing the lifestyle of his children. Just because he is later caught, should the cash be taken away from the chldren and given back to the bank? Of course not! To do so would harm the children, and the bank can certainly afford the loss. Any gain made from an illegal action should not be forfeited if children also benefit from the gain."
The major problem of LD is that his satire is indistinguishable from the opinion of the usual suspect leftie trolls...
Liberalism 101 Lesson 3:
If...
President Obama's latest political ploy -- granting new "rights" out of thin air, by Executive Order, to illegal immigrants who claim that they were brought into the country when they were children -- is all too typical of his short-run approach to the country's long-run problems.
Whatever the merits or demerits of the Obama immigration policy, his Executive Order is good only as long as he remains president, which may be only a matter of months after this year's election.
People cannot plan their lives on the basis of laws that can suddenly appear, and then suddenly...
...you are struggling under the weight of ever upward spiraling taxes and voice any complaint then you will be accused of not “caring” because, after all:
It’s for the children.
Now if the bank robber used the money to PAY someone (who didn't know the money was stolen money) then you would have a legitimate conflict of competing values.