In response to:

Philadelphia Came out in Astronomical Numbers for Obama

Uber Dave Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:04 PM
IDiotWimp Wrote: 4 minutes ago (1:54 PM) "I like to learn how the enemy "thinks", and I use the term loosely, and to remind people that there is more to life than partisan politics..." Partisan politics are the reason you're here Dotsie... ...Your partisanship is blatant despite the appearance you feign.
IDotWin Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:06 PM
There's your version of Debate again UD.
Uber Dave Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:11 PM
You're not just a partisan...

...You're a shill...
Robin311 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:13 PM
Oh, no, Dot....Uber Dave is correct. Your strict-line partisanship is incorporated into the comments you make. This much I will say for you, though. You more of an honest Liberal and have been willing to own up to the underlying points of progressive ideology that the Dems in general would rather Americans not even be aware of. Truth being told, folks at the head of the Dem party won't even touch it because they are afraid of the political backlash. Same reason the Obama admin held back on some of the rulings that got posted at FR since the election.
IDotWin Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:14 PM
IDotWin Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 2:17 PM
No one talks truth in an election Robin. That's not how you win. The problem is we don't talk truth after an election anymore either.

In Philadelphia President Obama won the city with 85% of the vote, but in 13 precincts he won 99% or more. This vote is mostly due to the large African American populations in these wards. Obama carried these same ones in 2008.

Even though many voters were not as enthusiastic to vote this year, these wards in Philadelphia managed to be just as excited to vote for Obama.

"In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working...