1 - 10 Next
The Southern Manifesto was written in 1956 by Democrats in response to the Supreme Court ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education that ended segregation legally. The Manifesto claimed the court acted capriciously in ruling and over-stepped their limits. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Manifesto It was written by Democrats less than ten years before The Great Society was enacted. So does anyone really suspect the Democrats had a change of heart, or legislated the people of color into a niche where they could be controlled with a pay check from the govt? That question was rhetorical. Of course they did this to make certain their great grand children would never sit across from a person of color in a job interview. Ever. Why else would LBJ have uttered the comment after passing The Great Society "We'll have those N-words voting Democrat for 200 years."
The liberal mindset never acknowledges failure, which would drive a change of philosophy. They continue soldering on, headed toward a Utopia that does not exist. Nowhere on this planet has Socialism worked to better the have nots. It has empowered the haves, but those of the liberal ilk, ready to toss everyone else under the bus. Wendy is on the cutting edge of this philosophy. To suggest this woman would somehow sift through her campaign and find a take-away of speaking for the majority, instead of the lunatic fringe, would be like asking Rosie O'Donnell to start shopping at the Sleek and Trim shop for her clothing. When I first saw someone suggest liberalism is a mental disorder I laughed. And continued to do so until I analyzed the truth behind that FB meme. They just believe in their hearts they didn't frame the argument of bigger govt, less freedom correctly. And if they were to get another shot, they will do better selling Americans the idea of allowing a faceless govt making personal decisions for all to be a better road. Even after overwhelming proof of its failure.. That exhibits a mental disorder to me. One Wendy has in spades.
1. I think Sony actually making a film where they ridicule a standing leader of a country, and make the asinine plot point of assassinating him was hubris filled and not well thought out. Their actions brought this to the fore and they are reaping what they sow. 2. I heard on TV last night this was run by this administration at some point. I didn't pay much attention to the comment, but if that is the case, it smacks of the smarmy attitude of Obama and his entire group of criminals by subscribing to this nonsensical film. 3. The flag wavers suggesting this is infringing on freedom seems odd to me. Frankly, any action that would cause James Franco and Seth Rogain (spelling intentional) to have their work stifled is a blessing in disguise. But to somehow equate this to Pearl Harbor - as some of the talking heads have done - diminishes both the memory of those that died, and exaggerates the importance of a freakin film. Introducing the aspect of the hack should be a wake-up call to all America we need to protect our assets. This was a small price to pay and could have been a power grid and a real catastrophe. However, the Clown in the White House will ignore this warning sign, and when real danger strikes, it will be blamed on others as if he is responsible for only things which circumvent the Constitution, empowering dictators, dealing with terrorists, and spending money on vacations. The hand wringing over anything but the cyber attack and its meaning is posturing on whomever is doing it. Including here with the "journalists" and posters.
Henry, if there was a like button I would have pushed it several time because of your post. I agree with it. But the part that resonates with me the most is this - Your messiah doesn't know what he's doing, but there is no shortage of arrogance coming out of his mouth.... I have worked in management a large portion of my working life. In that time there have been outstanding managers I wanted to mold my leadership after and then ones who flounder with no answers. It is clear Obama cannot reach across the aisle and garner an agreement with Republicans. So much in politics is give and take and the ones most successful have the ability to negotiate - when you hear tyhen say this what they say is fight, as in I will fight for you, which is incorrect and leaves an impression that is false - and these successful politicians can bring people together. Obama is well spoken. He is superior in his ability to give a speech. But once you have gained the office, and especially the Presidency, that ability isn't all one needs. You must have the ability to persuade. He is good at tossing out quotable comments that look wonderful on the 5 o'clock news. But once one digs in and looks for depth in his position, they see there is nothing. He is a bag of wind. Thus he cannot negotiate or bring both sides together. So he goes on fund raisers and makes speeches which will be on the news, and boldly claims he has a pen and a phone. Because he has no leadership ability beyond selling sycophants with his rhetoric. But here's the rub. This country is now filled with those very people who will believe anything the left says about the war on fill in the blank and how them left will redistribute wealth to get their votes. This is an empty suit with a gift for rhetoric. You nailed it.
This suit will do the job it is intended to do. Which is to smear a guy who actually looked decisive on the border issue and negate anything he gained. This is to protect Hilary from any really tough opponent. She will be the final piece of the progressive agenda if she gets control.
Microsoft exchange, which the IRS used, is structured to keep emails on the server if needed. But at some point space available will demand you do something about the growing emails you have stored on the server. So decision time comes and you have a choice of deletion or saving them to your computer's hard drive. As you state these were saved to a shared drive which is a protected portion of a server which has your log in. But clearly you should be forced to make a decision if your allotted space is filling up. Now you may manage your emails well enough that reaching the ceiling of your server space was never a question for you. But I assure you the exchange will at some point warn you of space available and ultimately not allow you to send nor receive emails without any space on the server. This is usually tech time. Call out the nerds to fix your stuff. The notion Lerner had sensitive information on her hard drive in emails could be a possibility. But no matter what, the server should have been backed up and redundancy available. The idea the IRS did not have this function and overwrote the server's hard drive every six months is laughable. And highly unbelievable. There would also be no need to destroy that hard drive since there is software which will clean a hard drive and do a wipe. Enough so it would be difficult to impossible to obtain any old information. Then reloading the OS would be on a clean disk and a simple matter. I myself would like to see the written protocol for this. I agree with some of your comments. I also would never presume to tell you how something worked unless I had my hands on it. But I know how exchange works and it has been stated they used exchange. I received over 100 emails a day and had to manage my space several times a year or save to my information on computer. I don't see anything given which suggest the IRS is different. But I agree this is baloney and someone is flat out lying.
In response to:

Watch: Is There A "War on Women"?

TxVietVet Wrote: Jul 10, 2014 10:16 AM
The ultimate war is on personal responsibility. And a promise by the left to assure anything goes if you vote us in. Including being responsible for you since obviously the implicit message is women are too stupid, lazy or outright incapabale of taking care of themselves. So the mindset in the 50's was men took care of women. The govt has supplanted this idea with govt takes care of women. How is that fighting for women to take care of themselves. Oh right, it's not.
Best post I have seen in a long time. If women decided that the best birth control was to keep their clothes on, would they expect the govt to pay for their wardrobe? Wish I could take credit for that.
Yes, I see the correlation to Alien. Then a little Hillary bursts from your chest and runs across the room and legislates more of her socialist agenda.
And yet there will be people who vote for Hillary for no other reason than her vagina.
1 - 10 Next