In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

txtiarosa Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 9:04 PM
Sure, Obama will appoint uber-leftists -- which will not be vigorously opposed even by a Repub. Senate. But to those who think Romney's appointees will be better, does the name JOHN ROBERTS mean anything?
pitar Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 9:18 PM
In order for Romney to get along with his Party and support-base he has to choose Conservative USSC Judges !

M-R is supported by J-DeMint, R-Paul, S-King, M-Lee, J-Brewer, N-Haley, w/M-R they'll have alot more Govt influence,

Obama will never work with JD, RP, SK, ML, JB, NH !

M-R has better, economic-policies-practices, domestic-oil-policy, less depndnc on foreign oil !

"Malor reductions in unneeded, unwarranted, wasteful-$, Federal $pending !"

Fed-Entitlmnts: US-citzns, legal-resdnts, illegal-aliens !

Fed-Prgrms-dpts-agncs-dvsns-ofcs, chrs-dirs-dptys-assts-wrkrs !

Author of AZ-SB-1070 Kris Kobach is on M-R's campaign team !

Obama's a Covert-Comunst-Marxst, Romney's is a mod-Cons-Rep who can get along with Reps, Cons, Inds, women !

President Obama tanked in the last debate. Good.

Now maybe people will listen when Mitt Romney says things like, "The genius of America is the free enterprise system, and freedom, and the fact that people can go out there and start a business. ... The private market and individual responsibility always work best."

They do.

But then Romney responded to Obama by essentially saying: I want big government, too!

We who hope for smaller government as a way to expand liberty and create prosperity are disturbed by what we heard last week. The GOP candidate painted himself as a big...