Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Wait—I’m Not Quite Through

txtiarosa Wrote: Jul 31, 2013 3:17 AM
Because it's common sense.
In response to:

Wait—I’m Not Quite Through

txtiarosa Wrote: Jul 31, 2013 3:15 AM
Neal, as far as I'm concerned you can rant any time you want! I like it.
I hope the digital door hits your a** on your way out.
In response to:

Late Night Libertarians

txtiarosa Wrote: Jul 21, 2013 9:08 PM
Sorry if you are offended, but they're still living off taxpayers. And the system doesn't encourage them to work hard.
In response to:

A Post-Post Office World

txtiarosa Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 11:41 AM
I'm not saying term limits is the answer, but the incompetents-er, I meant incumbents, have fixed the system to make it difficult to throw the rascals out.
In response to:

A Post-Post Office World

txtiarosa Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 11:39 AM
There are plenty of Americans who have the same mindset, unfortunately.
In response to:

Bill O’Reilly: Nowhere Man

txtiarosa Wrote: Apr 13, 2013 10:51 PM
The advocates of "same-sex marriage" don't believe in freedom or they wouldn't be trying to shut up anyone who doesn't agree with them.
In response to:

The Best of Comrades

txtiarosa Wrote: Mar 24, 2013 2:47 AM
All right, Mr. Ransom-some of these are reruns! We demand new material! :-)
Sometimes it's hard to argue against Murray Rothbard's statement "The state is a criminal gang writ large."
Yeah, Democrats were the engine. But we should never forget that they couldn't do their deeds without support of supposedly "conservative" Republicans.
In response to:

Stand For Life

txtiarosa Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 2:05 AM
I haven't read too many of the posts of "Sybil," but the ones I have read come across more as slamming Repubs and Dems equally. Is the majority here so in the tank for Republicans that they won't tolerate criticism of them?
Previous 21 - 30 Next