In response to:

A "Threat"? Really?

TX Gal Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:54 AM
Well, of course you question it, because you don't like that version. Conservatives, particularly on TH, would rather make up their own versions.
3204 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 11:30 AM
flagged for excessively repetitive stupidity
DevinDenver Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:53 AM
So, that could NOT possibly have happened? Is that your contention TX Gal? Like it could not possibly have happened that the head of the EPA created multiple email accounts outside of the EPA to conduct official business without it being subject to FOIA requests? Is that what you are saying?
tuttut Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:03 AM
If you'd get off your back for Obuttjob for a second, you'd realize that there would be no possible reason for Woodward to regret telling the truth unless someone was going to punish him for doing so. Obama OWNS the sequester, and, apparently, YOU!
Marc_H Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:56 AM
this from a commie obama clown...

Last night, after Bob Woodward's account of a "very senior person" at The White House who "threatened" him, I guessed that it was Valerie Jarrett, given her history of excoriating and bullying the President's critics.

Turns out I was wrong -- the person was Gene Sperling, who has, it seems, given Politico his email to Bob Woodward, upon which Woodward based his charge of being threatened.  Although I appreciate Woodward's all-too-rare willingness to state truths the Obama White House finds unpleasant, I've got to say that -- given the context -- it's hard to characterize what Sperling said to...