Other Americans, however, do not want Roe v. Wade overturned. Many of them also have a strong moral belief—that a woman should not be forced, by her country's laws banning abortion, to bear a child if, for what she believes is good reason, she does not wish to do so. Bearing a child is a private or family decision, and that privacy was upheld by the Supreme Court's 1973 decision.2 The content of Roe v. Wade and other cases, as summarized in "U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Concerning Reproductive Rights 1965-2003," is examined historically. In Roe, by a vote of 7-2, the Court invalidated a Texas law prohibiting abortions not necessary to save the woman's life and decided that "any governmental interference with [a woman's] right is subjec

Other Americans, however, do not want Roe v. Wade overturned. Many of them also have a strong moral belief—that a woman should not be forced, by her country's laws banning abortion, to bear a child if, for what she believes is good reason, she does not wish to do so. Bearing a child is a private or family decision, and that privacy was upheld by the Supreme Court's 1973 decision.2 The content of Roe v. Wade and other cases, as summarized in "U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Concerning Reproductive Rights 1965-2003," is examined historically. In Roe, by a vote of 7-2, the Court invalidated a Texas law prohibiting abortions not necessary to save the woman's life and decided that "any governmental interference with [a woman's] right is subjec

Other Americans, however, do not want Roe v. Wade overturned. Many of them also have a strong moral belief—that a woman should not be forced, by her country's laws banning abortion, to bear a child if, for what she believes is good reason, she does not wish to do so. Bearing a child is a private or family decision, and that privacy was upheld by the Supreme Court's 1973 decision.2 The content of Roe v. Wade and other cases, as summarized in "U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Concerning Reproductive Rights 1965-2003," is examined historically. In Roe, by a vote of 7-2, the Court invalidated a Texas law prohibiting abortions not necessary to save the woman's life and decided that "any governmental interference with [a woman's] right is subjec

Other Americans, however, do not want Roe v. Wade overturned. Many of them also have a strong moral belief—that a woman should not be forced, by her country's laws banning abortion, to bear a child if, for what she believes is good reason, she does not wish to do so. Bearing a child is a private or family decision, and that privacy was upheld by the Supreme Court's 1973 decision.2 The content of Roe v. Wade and other cases, as summarized in "U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Concerning Reproductive Rights 1965-2003," is examined historically. In Roe, by a vote of 7-2, the Court invalidated a Texas law prohibiting abortions not necessary to save the woman's life and decided that "any governmental interference with [a woman's] right is subjec

You've been whining/praying about abortion for 40 years, such a wilderness NO RESULT, NONE, NADA, ZILCH same prayers against gay marriage, so what does this mean? Looks like jesus/god pro choice or don't exist, take your choice, so to speak. Certainly with the enormous progress of gay marriage, looks like Jesus is for it, and why shouldn't gay taxpayers have same rights as all Americans? WHATEVER HAPPENED TO LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL, except not for fetuses, unless THE WOMAN CHOOSES TO CONTINUE A PREGNANCY. HER CHOICE, so says SCOTUS.

YOU LIE LIKE A RUG AND OBVIOUSLY DON'T READ THE LATEST NEWS: Speakers at CPAC logically would also include mr. magoo, goofy, mickey mouse and donald duck, spelled wrong in GOP circles. Well, pubs couldn't get bin laden, can't govern, we all know that. gw bush/pubs did give us recessions/stk mkt crash/tragic iraq war 5000 dead, 30000 wounded many badly How can you peeps on this board forget the veterans, dead, disfigured, badly wounded and hurting and all the doing of bush, conservatives, pubs, not bright. Thank christ no Dems involved in that terrible decision, shattered so many families. President Obama in so many ways bringing America back from the bad bush years, worst than reagan/bush because of war dead, financial crisis and ----

YOU LIE LIKE A RUG AND OBVIOUSLY DON'T READ THE LATEST NEWS: Speakers at CPAC logically would also include mr. magoo, goofy, mickey mouse and donald duck, spelled wrong in GOP circles. Well, pubs couldn't get bin laden, can't govern, we all know that. gw bush/pubs did give us recessions/stk mkt crash/tragic iraq war 5000 dead, 30000 wounded many badly How can you peeps on this board forget the veterans, dead, disfigured, badly wounded and hurting and all the doing of bush, conservatives, pubs, not bright. Thank christ no Dems involved in that terrible decision, shattered so many families. President Obama in so many ways bringing America back from the bad bush years, worst than reagan/bush because of war dead, financial crisis and ----

While Obama has raised lots from small donors, he also leads all pubs in money from the rich: Obama still leads in financial sector donations, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. He has secured more cash from the financial elite, at this point, than all the GOP candidates combined. He has even raised twice as much as they have from Bain Capital, the venture firm co-founded by Romney. pubs have no chance at all in 2012......................

Doesn't this tell you pubs are toast?....................?... 50 million seniors are paying attention. 7,808,966 actions taken Your benefits protected As the supercommittee spent months attempting to come to a deal, AARP activists made sure that older Americans had a voice in the debate. Over 7 million letters, phone calls, and photos were sent to Congress, telling them to protect Social Security and Medicare from cuts. Though the supercommittee did not reach agreement on reducing the nation's debt, your hard work helped stop any cuts to the hard-earned Medicare and Social Security benefits millions rely on. Senior have been greatly benefited by Obamacare, as have so many others, So seniors will also be fighting for DEMOCRATS.

Yes, such as DOMA, defense of marriage act It should be up to the states and just as New York has now followed MA and made gay marriage legal. BTW, Romney was gov of MA when marriage was made legal for gays. Why not? Should gay taxpayers have same rights as anyone else? That's what American revolution was all about: liberty and justice for all. You don't really believe it's fair to say that's true only for straight peeps, do you?