In response to:

Embrace the Sequester

tuttut Wrote: Feb 22, 2013 8:20 AM
The real reason Obama is having PMS over the sequester is because it stops his implementation of Cloward-Piven in its tracks. Instead of making more people dependent on government, he may actually have to wean some people off. He's only got four years to create so much dependency that the system collapses under the load, and the sequester, minus more taxes, will seriously impede his plan. So sad, too bad. He suxxx.

Something odd happened a few months ago as I weighed the various aspects of the dreaded Sequester Monster, a creature vilified across party lines.

It is often true that if enough people in government say something is bad, there is a strong chance of redeeming qualities.

So my journey began. The only element of the sequester that bothered me in the least was military cuts. But my friends at the Institute for Policy Innovation properly observe that defense spending will not fall below 2007 levels, which were 75% above pre-9/11Pentagon budgets.

High enough for me? Of course not. I actually want...