In response to:

To Understand the Democratic Party’s Re-definition of Marriage - Follow the Money!

TruthSetsUFree Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 9:04 AM
“We support the right of all families to have equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the law" Or put another way - We support the right of all families to have equal respect under the law, We support the right of all families to have equal responsibilities under the law. And We support the right of all families to have equal protections under the law.
Jay Wye Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 11:40 AM
Homos already HAVE -equal- right to marriage;
they can marry another person of the opposite sex the same as any other person.
That IS the definition of "marriage";man-woman,it's been that way for several thousand years.

This is all about the REDEFINITION of "marriage" to be something it's never been,and thus FORCING other states to recognize the abomination via Article IV,sec 1.
Homos are seeking SPECIAL rights and the reordering of US society to suit their agenda and mental illness.
Jay Wye Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 11:40 AM
Of course,some people IGNORE the second part of Article IV,sec 1;
"and the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts,Records,and Proceedings shall be proved,and the Effect thereof."
Congress "prescribed the manner" by enacting DOMA.
THAT alone allows DOMA to be Constitutional.

Congress is SPECIFICALLY given the power to decide,and they did.
Bill1895 Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 9:28 AM
Families are formed by blood relationships or marriage of a man and a woman.

What some people want to do is through the definition of family out the window.
James2517 Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 9:41 AM
Well then single Bill, form your family by finding a woman and no one will bother you.
Bill1895 Wrote: Oct 06, 2012 10:50 AM
And I will fight to keep the legal definition of marriage as a man and a woman and to keep people like James away from the Boy Scouts of America.

Our country made history in 2008 when we elected our first black president. The 2012 election is already historic as well, but for a much less promising reason. This year marks the first time in history that a major political party has put the redefinition of marriage into its national platform.

The obvious question for many of my friends was, "Why are they in such a hurry?" If their victory is so inevitable, as they always tell the mainstream media; if the next generation is as likely to fall into their grasp as they think; why don’t they just trust...