In response to:

The GOP's Immigration Mess

Truthseeker Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 5:10 PM
Yeah, we would have had 55 millon more workers if those 55 million "people" weren't aborted. Typical Hewitt - all pretzel logic.
PhillupSpace2 Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 6:22 PM
Does that mean there would be 50 million unemployed today instead of 20? Last I heard there were not enough jobs for the people who are here today!
RyanM Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 7:26 PM
What needs to be done here is to have an immigration moratorium. The number of people allowed to emigrate to the US is way too high.
Carl469 Wrote: Jan 26, 2013 2:20 AM
Finally, someone here grasps the issue.
Carl469 Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 5:50 PM
Your "logic" assumes that these 55 million aborted embroyos and fetuses would have jobs or at least be looking for them. Moreover, you assume that if they carried to term, their moms wouldn't have decided against having the children they eventually did have.

On Saturday I will be debating Mark Kirkorian on immigration policy before the National Review Institute.

I am a "wet," on the topic. Have been since I opposed California's proposition 187 in 1994.

Mark, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, is a "dry."

Here's the interesting thing about out "debate," to be moderated by National Review's Jim Geraghty: Even if one or the other of us succeeds in persuading everyone in the room of our point of view, it doesn't matter. Not a lick. The GOP is branded as an anti-immigrant party, especially with voters under 30, the...