Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Let 'Em Rot in Hell

TrustNoOne Wrote: Feb 11, 2015 1:48 PM
Taking prisoners in war is a quaint Western idea. Under Islam, if a prisoner is taken they were to be kept (or sold) as slaves. The newest trend is to burn them alive. We should grant then the honor of following their customs. Otherwise, we are in the same position as the Plains Indians (Native Americans), counting coup while the enemy shoots to kill. We know who won that war.
There is little doubt that the court will rule that sodomite marriage is a Constitutionally protected right, thus OFFICIALLY making the United States an enemy of YHWH. Just like Christians under Rome or the former Soviet Union, we need to remember that we will ALWAYS be the minority. Christ Himself addressed the issue: Matthew 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen. Christ himself And gave us an example of how to respond. Matthew 22: 15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk. 16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men. 17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not? 18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites? 19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny. 20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? 21 They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's. 22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way. I am not saying Christians should not try to influence the government, but we should realize that the majority, and thus the government, HATE US because we follow Christ, not their God. One suggesting, refuse to cooperate with the government in regard to weddings, that is, Christians can have a Religious ceremony, but those performing it should not sign off on sate issued marriage licenses, and thus become a State actor, giving the Satanic groups the opportunity to force Churches to recognize and perform Sodomite marriage as Christians who bake wedding cakes are being forced to participate. The Christian couples are of course free to also have a civil ceremony if they like.
In response to:

Stealing From God

TrustNoOne Wrote: Feb 10, 2015 11:24 AM
The article speaks about the " prevalence of evil and suffering in our world." A TRUE atheist has no problem with this. If there is no God, then there is no such thing as evil. Only what is considered socially acceptable. I just wish they would be TRUE, LOGICAL atheists and NOT Libtards who protest against "evils" such as discrimination, genocide etc., which are simply subsets of evolution, survival of the fittest. It is insanity to grant equal rights to other cultures and races. If nature acted that way, there would be no life higher than the first one celled creatures.
In response to:

Why ‘Gay Marriage’ is Evil

TrustNoOne Wrote: Jan 26, 2015 8:27 PM
RE: "The Bible, throughout both the Old and New Testaments, unambiguously condemns as sin rising to the level of “an abomination,” all same-sex sexual conduct, be it, “loving, monogamous and committed,” or otherwise." Actually, no. It is sex between MEN that rises to the level of “an abomination”. The key passages are: Leviticus 18:22“?‘Do not have sexual relations with a man [Hebrew : ??????Transliteration za•char, Strong's2145 ] as one does with a woman[Hebrew: ???????? Transliteration i•shah; Strongs 802] ; that is detestable.23“?‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion." And Leviticus 20:13“?‘If a man has sexual relations with a man [ with a male Hebrew: ?????? Translateration za•char Strong's 2145 as one does with a woman with a woman,{ Hebrew: ???????? Transliteration i•shah, Strong's 802] , both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. 14“?‘If a man marries both a woman and her mother, it is wicked. Both he and they must be burned in the fire, so that no wickedness will be among you. 15“?‘If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he is to be put to death, and you must kill the animal. 16“?‘If a woman approaches an animal to have sexual relations with it, kill both the woman and the animal. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Note that both sections address sins which include men AND women, however the section regarding sexual relations with one of the same sex ONLY refer to males. Saying that whatever applies to one sex applies to another is falling into the trap of saying there is NO difference between the sexes and I submit is also a sin on the order of Eve's, when she added " or even touch it" to YHWH's commandment not to eat it. Both Eve's addition to YHWY word and the Sodomites insistence that YHWH (the God of Abraham) is evil are basically the same, putting themselves above God. While I am sure the author had no evil intent, falling into the Satanist "Gender Neutrality" trap turns the discussion into one based on personal opinion, not scripture. If there is a one size fits all, women are no different from men, then why is it wrong for a person to have sex with one gender but not the other. After all, they are both the same.
In response to:

Why ‘Gay Marriage’ is Evil

TrustNoOne Wrote: Jan 26, 2015 8:26 PM
RE: "The Bible, throughout both the Old and New Testaments, unambiguously condemns as sin rising to the level of “an abomination,” all same-sex sexual conduct, be it, “loving, monogamous and committed,” or otherwise." Actually, no. It is sex between MEN that rises to the level of “an abomination”. The key passages are: Leviticus 18:22“?‘Do not have sexual relations with a man [Hebrew : ??????Transliteration za•char, Strong's2145 ] as one does with a woman[Hebrew: ???????? Transliteration i•shah; Strongs 802] ; that is detestable.23“?‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion." And Leviticus 20:13“?‘If a man has sexual relations with a man [ with a male Hebrew: ?????? Translateration za•char Strong's 2145 as one does with a woman with a woman,{ Hebrew: ???????? Transliteration i•shah, Strong's 802] , both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. 14“?‘If a man marries both a woman and her mother, it is wicked. Both he and they must be burned in the fire, so that no wickedness will be among you. 15“?‘If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he is to be put to death, and you must kill the animal. 16“?‘If a woman approaches an animal to have sexual relations with it, kill both the woman and the animal. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Note that both sections address sins which include men AND women, however the section regarding sexual relations with one of the same sex ONLY refer to males. Saying that whatever applies to one sex applies to another is falling into the trap of saying there is NO difference between the sexes and I submit is also a sin on the order of Eve's, when she added " or even touch it" to YHWH's commandment not to eat it. Both Eve's addition to YHWY word and the Sodomites insistence that YHWH (the God of Abraham) is evil are basically the same, putting themselves above God. While I am sure the author had no evil intent, falling into the Satanist "Gender Neutrality" trap turns the discussion into one based on personal opinion, not scripture. If there is a one size fits all, women are no different from men, then why is it wrong for a person to have sex with one gender but not the other. After all, they are both the same.
Nos Nevets: You are dead on as far as you go. However you failed to mention that as a "Muslim" (in the same sense that Americans are "Christian" - that is they were raised in a culture based on that religion), he does not see the imposition of PURE Islamic religion (ISIS etc.) as a significant threat. His immediate goal is the destruction of Christianity in the US.
Ah Colorado. Where you can buy and smoke marijuana but not e-cigarettes. However there is consistency. The state that wants to ban civilian rifles because they LOOK like a military assault rifle wants to ban nicotine delivery systems because the LOOK like a tobacco product. Question to make a Libtard head explode. Would it be ok to smoke cannabis oil in an e-cigarette?
In response to:

The Subdivided States Of America

TrustNoOne Wrote: Jan 18, 2015 3:59 PM
• I will bridge the gap between black and white and between America and other countries. He is absolutely doing his best to fulfill this promise, the ONLY one he ever intended to keep. He bridging the gap is lowering the standard of living of whites to that of the lowest of any race in any country.
In response to:

Are Christians and Muslims the Same?

TrustNoOne Wrote: Jan 12, 2015 5:16 PM
“Offend a Christian and he is obliged to pray for your salvation. Offend a Muslim and he is obliged to murder you.” That, and the fact that a Muslim is obligated to murder you if you even tell a Muslim about your religion as well as any Muslim that converts, explains why Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. Thus Muslims and Libtards identical in when it comes to tolerance, except that Muslims are willing to make sacrifices, including their lives, for their religion.
Atlanta has LONG been the Sodomite capital of the South East. Thus you have the Black Mayor who is in power largely because of the efforts of Black Christians (MLK was an Atlanta Baptist minister) showing his gratitude to Christians by declaring Christianity evil. So where is REV AL? There is no money in opposing the Sodomite, only a fight with a RICH (DINC - Double Income No Kids) highly organized and dedicated enemy.
In response to:

The Sword Is Mightier Than The Pen

TrustNoOne Wrote: Jan 12, 2015 11:41 AM
This article is in many ways WORSE that the evil it addresses, since it has a half truth which can be more damaging than an obvious lie. There is NO reason for all the stupid wars the US insists on starting or sticking our noses into. There is no place on the Globe the US doesn't want to start a war. Rome did not go to war with other countries to "Liberate" the people of those countries from their own government and then give them tons of gold and silver to "rebuild" after the war. Rome also did not invite the enemy to come live in Rome (well, ok, except as slaves), support them with taxes collected from Roman's and pay them for every little "Carthaginian" they could pop out.
Previous 11 - 20 Next