In response to:

Awful: New Obama Ad Suggests Romney Wouldn't Have Ordered Bin Laden Raid

Truncheon Wrote: Apr 27, 2012 11:02 PM
Troll blathers: "Read the constitution" I'm afraid that the "Bill of Rights", you know, that part you cited ... has nothing whatsoever to do with what Congress is empowered to tax and spend on. The fact that you invoked it just demonstrate how laughably ignorant you actually are. It's unwise to talk about things of which you have zero knowledge. All the things the Congress is *Constitutionally* permitted to tax and spend on, are in Article 1 Section 8, which I cited for you. You may now cease speaking of the Constitution, for you have demonstrated you haven't the slightest clue about it.
Hit the road barry Wrote: Apr 27, 2012 11:08 PM
Flagged for being inept, wimpy, tiresome, redundant, a disgrace, a hussein tool,etc....
Truncheon Wrote: Apr 27, 2012 11:16 PM
Your a very good stalker. It's been a while since I had one.

Ugly desperation from Team Obama, and it's not even May yet.  Behold, The One's latest ad, congratulating himself over his signature "gutsy call," and....raising questions about his Republican adversary:

Like everything else the man says, Obama's admonition against "spiking the football" after bin Laden's execution came with an expiration date.  The administration has been dancing in the endzone every chance they get, engaging in tawdry and