In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

Trublu Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 4:13 PM
So a converted skeptic now thinks he was wrong is the crux of the article. This counts as evidence. Why is it every time we get evidence of AGW it turns out to be forged, fudged or skewed? And why is it every time there is evidence that refutes AGW the proponents move the goal posts and claim it is not about global warming it is about climate change? Algore and his minions are no different than the rain men of the last century who promised wonderful results from the weather if people would just give them their money. The article does prove there is money to be made from switching sides too.
suyts Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 10:57 PM
He was never a skeptic. He only called himself one after he started the BEST project. Muller is a showman, and certainly not an expert on the subject. http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/07/29/muller-never-was-a-skeptic/

A prominent global warming scientist, Peter Gleick, who was chairman of the ethics committee at the American Geophysical Union, admitted last year that he stole some documents- and he may have forged others- from the conservative think-tank the Heartland Institute. But that’s all in a day’s work for a work-a-day climate warrior. The important thing isn’t the quest for the truth in global climate research, but, as Charlie Sheen would say, winning. With winning comes cash.   

Because for some time it’s been clear, that in the climate debate, instead of actually accomplishing something worthwhile, all the attention will be...

Related Tags: Climate Change