Good idea, this would also preserve the "innocent until proven guilty" concept we in America have been led to believe.

Yeah, the Libs will make it a "HATE CRIME".

I saw on a program this morning ( the msm with Charlie Rose) three women whining about what needs to be done in corporate America to reduce the gaps with regards to incomes, executive positions and CEO's that seem to favor males. They prefaced the discussion by saying that over the last 30 years women attend college at a rate similar to men, why the disparity? I thought immediately that degrees in "women's Studies" and Sociology don't lead to becoming CEO of big businesses. DUH! I didn't read this article until today either.

There is lawlessness coming from the top in this country. The DoJ will not enforce immigration laws among many others, the POTUS will circumvent Congress, "if Congress doesn't act, I will" executive orders among other things. When I hear any politician state that "We are a nation bound by the rule of law" I think, yeah except the ones that are inconvenient right now you POS.

I can't believe that criminals would stoop so low as to steal fully automatic military weaponry, when they could lawfully purchase semi-automatic civilian weaponry at retail price from gun stores in the U.S. border states. Monarch Obama said so. Besides, Mexico is a gun free utopia. The signs along the freeways headed south prove it, "GUNS ILLEGAL IN MEXICO"... says it all.

When ignorance is common, common sense is ignorance. If it was common sense to re-elect Monarch Obama we don't need "common" sense anything.

Unions were created to keep the big greedy employer from abusing the worker. The big greedy employer of public sector union employees is the taxpayer. Clearly they need protection from us, or is it the other way around?

The primary system the republicans use should be replaced with a system in which the vote is weighted. If, for example there are five candidates on the ballot, the voter ranks them 1-5 with 1 getting the most points and 5 getting the fewest. This would prevent, say 4 conservatives splitting up a vote and the lone moderate winning the pot (Mc Lame) and receiving the nomination.

HE WAS PROBABLY DOING SOMETHING MORE EMBARRASSING THAN READING TO SECOND GRADERS AND THE MEDIA/PROPAGANDIST WOULD NOT COVER IT. Or no wonder he thought it was about some video, he wasn't informed enough to know the difference between Egypt and Lybia.

I, as a man, have a problem with author's liberal use of the terms man and men. She pretty much hit it spot on with this article though. Males are pro-choice because it allows them to postpone or even prevent them from actually becoming men.

You then also support close inspection of the Immigration lobby, the anti gun lobby and the homopomorphic global warming lobby...