In response to:

Another Report on Benghazi Attack Finds State Department at Fault

TROUBLED_CALIFORNIAN Wrote: Dec 31, 2012 1:22 PM
wonder why the "guy on the ground" didn't take prudent actions to ensure his OWN safety? "left out to dry" kind of like the American people were "left out to dry" when GW ignored the warnings of the 9/11 attack?
Lietuva Wrote: Dec 31, 2012 2:29 PM
You truly are "troubled"; please get some professional help.
TROUBLED_CALIFORNIAN Wrote: Dec 31, 2012 2:13 PM
like decide NOT to go to Benghazi because HE thought it was NOT safe????
1Falcon1 Wrote: Dec 31, 2012 1:59 PM
MudontheTires Wrote: Dec 31, 2012 1:37 PM
"wonder why the "guy on the ground" didn't take prudent actions to ensure his OWN safety?"

Like what? Abandon his post and run home?

kind of like the American people were "left out to dry" when GW ignored the warnings of the 9/11 attack?

And just what did President Bush ignore? A bunch of general warnings that nobody could verfy? S T F U you stupid POS.



It’s the second report to come out about the Benghazi terrorist attack that left four Americans dead and not surprisingly, the second report to be highly critical of the State Department.  The Senate homeland security committee’s bipartisan report, ‘Flashing Red,’ obtained by Fox News, outlines 10 key findings about the attack. 

A scathing Senate committee report on the Benghazi terrorist attack faults the State Department for failing to adequately respond to mounting security threats in the lead-up to the assault. The report says the facility was woefully under-protected at a time when the region, according to...