In response to:

Marriage: A Supreme Test of Rights

Troglodite Wrote: Mar 04, 2013 10:55 PM
Members of the lavender lobby like to point to the alleged parallels between statutes against gay marriage and those against mixed race marriage. Historically, the comparison fails. With a very small number of exceptions (so minor that hardly anyone even knows what they are), marriage has always and everywhere been a man-woman thing. Anti-black racism, on the other hand, was invented to justify black slavery in the New World. The invention was fairly recent, as historical things go, and probably reflected a subconsciously guilty conscience on the part of the inventors.

From the very beginning, homosexual “marriage” activists have sought to hijack not only the moral authority of the Civil Rights Movement, but also the legal arguments which liberated minorities from centuries of legalized oppression and discrimination.

After decades of aggressive activism, the common sense understanding of marriage has become almost hopelessly mired in incomprehensible legal terminology. It becomes difficult for everyday observers to navigate the convoluted logic homosexual activists employ as they attempt to remake one of civilization’s oldest institutions. The argument that redefining marriage to include homosexual couples is only “fair” rests on a specious interpretation of the equal protection...