In response to:
And the other 40% are so immeasurably ignorant that they actually believe that trickle down economics work. You have eight years of the Bush administration to look at. Want to repeat that?
For weeks President Obama has traveled the country delivering speech after speech asserting that if implemented, the so-called “Buffett Rule” would “stabilize” our national debt over the next ten years. In reality, however, it would do almost nothing to solve our lingering budget woes or pay off our national debt. Nevertheless, his unrelenting tax-the-rich mantra seems to be resonating with voters. According to the latest Gallup poll, 6 in 10 Americans support the Buffett rule – named for billionaire investor Warren Buffett – a policy that would impose a 30...
That's not the question you asked. You asked if we want to go back to that. The answer is obviously yes. BTW - The revenues in Bush's last years were 10% higher than Clinton's BEST year.
The housing crash belongs entirely to the Democrats. They own it lock, stock, and barrel. The only thing Bush was at fault for in the housing crash was restraining himself to the powers vested in the President by the Constitution and subsequent legislation and thus not shutting down subprime loans by an abuse of his authority.
You really don't know squat, do you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_public_debt
When GW Bush left office...our debt was 10.7 trillion dollars....and we now owe 15.6 trillion.....Obama has add almost 5 trillion dollars in 3.5 years.
Yea you liberals should be so ever proud of the FAILURE IN CHIEF....OBAMA.....
WE WILL END THE OBAMA ERROR IN NOVEMBER 2012!!!!
Compared to the Obama economy the Bush economy was boom.