"Lebanese policemen is the ONY one you provided that has VIDEO as a possible reason" Anyone who wants to actually read the links can see that your comment is false.

"2. name all the eruptions in those multiple countries and the DATES and also the violence" This is by no means a comprehensive list. Tunisa http://www.trust.org/item/?map=tunisia-death-toll-rises-to-four-in-us-embassy-attack/ Yemen http://edition.cnn.com/2012/09/13/world/meast/yemen-us-embassy-protests/index.html Pakistan http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia/2012/09/20129219618263113.html Sudan http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/09/201291482159758224.html Lebanon http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Sep-14/187902-15-lebanese-policemen-injured-in-protest-over-anti-islam-film.ashx Egypt http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2012/Sep-14/187902-15-lebanese-policemen-injured-in-protest-over-anti-islam-film.ashx

"So now it is part of a plan even though there was no plan?" You don't seem to understand the concept of definitive statements. What part of "We don't know." and "you cannot discount the video" do you not understand? That you cannot discount the video means it may or may not have been a factor. The attack didn't require intricate planning. It could have been thought up a week before, a day before, or possibly someone had the kernal of an idea a few months before. The video caused numerous eruptions in numerous places during the same week. It is during the same week that it was translated into Arabic. Again, what is clear is that the security arrangements were not acceptable. And that is a message that needs to be emphasized -- particularly if Hillary Clinton runs for President.

If I am desperate, why can't you answer. You do agree with me that the Libyan campaign was a dumb thing to do. Is that correct?

You don't understand the culture over there. You also don't seem to get the complete state of anarchy in Libya. And all I said about the video is that it cannot be discounted. Perhaps it was used as part of a plan. Who knows? There were multiple eruptions in a number of other countries in reaction to the video. And if those people had easy access to weapons caches, I can assure you they would have used them. Again, this video was translated into Arabic and re-released the week of 9/11. Perhaps a Libyan militia was behind it and wanted to use it as cover. You can't tell. What you can tell is that there was no excuse for the security arrangements in Benghazi. And I have no idea why you are so averse about emphasizing that.

Hey I'd be glad to take a correction on that. You are claiming then that you agree with me, that engaging in a bombing campaign to turn Libya into another Somalia was a pretty dumb thing to do. And shows an amateur and naive view about our military and how it should be used. I am glad to join you in that.

I cannot be covering for Obama because the less planning the attack took the more incompetent his administration is. Obama was easy to beat. And his incompetence here in the matter of security and proper backup, along with the Secretary of State, is there for all to see. If you want to get side-tracked with Bill Kristol and his bloviating ideologues then do that. As far as I'm concerned, Obama owes them a thank you letter.

You don't understand the culture over there. Remember the Danish cartoons? The problem is this video got translated into Arabic and re-released the week of 9/11. That's somewhat of a large coincidence.

WHO bombed lybia FUABRACK DID while the republicans in congress tried to STOP IT That would have been nice. But most of them said he didn't go in there soon enough.

Ah yes In neocon speak there are 2 groups of people -- neocons or liberals. Therefore, Conservatives have to be liberals (or implied nuts which is what you did with your Ron Paul terminology.)