" by which politicians force one economic group to subsidize another. Politicians love this technique. Very few people are even aware this is happeningand how much it is costing them. It is in reality taxation without representation and we should all rebell against it by voting the bastards out of office.

Agreed. But add health insurance to the list. I believe all states regulate insurance and make it illegal for you to buy across state lines. This enables state legislatures to to mandate whom and what insurance policies must cover. Most states completely distort their insurance markets which is the true cause of our healthcare crisis. The culprit is called "cross subsidization

Obama channeling Ronnie is kind of like Jane Fonda playing Nancy. Some things in life should never occupy the same space.

Obama channeling Ronnie is kind of like Jane Fonda playing Nancy. Some things in life should never occupy the same space.

Patrick, Freedom means taking responsibility. When we borrowed that money, we promised to pay. We must keep that promise. Reduce the debt, yes. Pay it down to zero, yes. But we have no right to break our promise by "cancelling" our national debt.

The problem with Boortz thesis is that it does not count the ilegal votes. Dems are going to pull out all the stops on this one. Expect massive voter fraud.

OK, You should see how Conservatives are treating on Lib sites. Mistreatment occurs on both but disportionately more on Lib sites. And, then the Lib sites ban any Conservative posting comments.

It's fine for you to call out Prager on this matter, I always love a good fight for the truth, but don't expect a victory. Anyone who knows anything at all about the Korean War knows that the Communist's surprize blitzkreig attack in June 1950 was naked aggression and itself an act of Imperialism. Therefore, anyone claiming that all USA wars since WWII were imperialistic must be either ignorant of the Korean War or a liar.

Wow, Anne, how clever. Did it hurt your brain to come up with that one? Seriously, your comment proves Prager's point.

Every thing above is irrelevant once you view the life in the womb as a person. At this point those same above rights apply to the unborn person with the right to life trumping all others.