In response to:

A Remedial Lesson in Public Finance Economics for the GOP

Tom24 Wrote: Sep 08, 2012 1:18 PM
Furthermore Kirk, If you keep the argument to spending argument, then it is very easy to make a moral and logical case that spending is a problem that requires spending cuts. If you call it a morally neutral based mathematically defined debt or deficit problem you open yourself up to the argument that increased taxes are one reasonable solution to this problem. If a Repubick then fails to agree, he seems unreasonable, uncompromising and extreme. This is why Repubiks like Bob Dole, McCain, Romney and the Bushes always lose the argument. This why they are called "the tax collectors for the welfare state", because they have reduced the argument to one of accounting. The argument should be a moral one about waste, dependency, etc.

Everyone has a cross to bear in life, some sort of burden or obligation, often self-imposed.

For some inexplicable reason, I’ve decided that one of my responsibilities is to educate a backwards and primitive people who seem impervious to common sense, simple logic, and strong principles.

As you’ve probably guessed already, I’m talking about Republicans.

I’ve already identified them at the Stupid Party, but they seem especially ill-informed and clueless on the topic of government borrowing.

I’ve specifically warned that they are economically (and

Related Tags: GOP Economics Finance