In response to:

Mitt Romney, Big-Government Man

togubin Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:05 PM
Department of Energy should go as well. Does absolutely nothing, and costs 100s of millions a year.
rickmcq Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:35 PM
Clever, Fuzzy, but not a vote-getting position I fear.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:30 PM
Spread it out over a week?
SMyles Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:28 PM
I honestly never learned a lot about Perry but I admired him for admitting he didn't know a lot about the FED until Paul made it an issue. It's refreshing to see a politician admit they didn't know something. And even more refreshing when gave credit where credit was due.


rickmcq Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:20 PM
Where were you guys with this list when Rick Perry needed you? (grin)
I am in agreement with these Departments being eliminated, but I also understand that Romney would not want to try to get elected on a pledge to throw 1,000 EPA employees, 19,00 Dept of Energy employees, 5,500 Dept of Education employees, and 205,000 Homeland Security employees into the streets overnight.
Fuzzy2 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 2:13 PM
Don't turn off the light until the EPA is gone too.

President Obama tanked in the last debate. Good.

Now maybe people will listen when Mitt Romney says things like, "The genius of America is the free enterprise system, and freedom, and the fact that people can go out there and start a business. ... The private market and individual responsibility always work best."

They do.

But then Romney responded to Obama by essentially saying: I want big government, too!

We who hope for smaller government as a way to expand liberty and create prosperity are disturbed by what we heard last week. The GOP candidate painted himself as a big...