1 - 8
There are so many examples of the One Way Street of the Left. They demand everyone else to be "tolerant", but absolutely refuse to ever be tolerant of anyone's opinion but their own. They demand Freedom of Speech, but are the first to censor and shout down everyone who even hints at stating an opposite viewpoint, especially any viewpoint that is consistent with Christian values. They scream "hate" whenever anyone declines to activelly support their position, but their organizations, like the Southern Poverty Law Center (a group that frequently labels conservative organizations as "hate groups"), is one that conspires to hire gunmen that go into the offices of those organizations and actually shoot people. And on and on and on...... They demand nothing short of active participation in their most evil agenda and rebellion against God, or be severely punished by whatever means, legal or illegal, available
Another example of the accuracy of this article: The head of the Massachusetts Dept. of Education was quoted last year as stating that EVERY public education student in that state must sign onto acceptance of homosexuality or be punished. He further stated that in the face of that demand, any student who merely remains silent and does nothing is guilty of "bullying" and will be punished for that, and that only active statements of acceptance are will be satisfactory. Complete insanity, and incompetence to head up a state agency, especially one involving children!!!
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:29 AM
Right on the mark, Joseph 64
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:28 AM
But the U.S. Supreme Court HAS upheld the FCC's definition of "indecent". So, it is your post that is proceeding from a wholly incorrect premise, not the article.
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:25 AM
Absoute B.S. When you bought a TV, did you have to sign something saying you consent to anything, much less indecency. I didn;'t and therefore, don't try to tell me I consented to anything. The mere act of buying a TV is NOT consent to indecency. I'm sick of the god complex of demented individuals like you. You are the problem with the world
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:23 AM
That hasn't been sufficient to protect our right to not have access to indecency in our homes, obviously, as there are 1.5 million broadcast indecency complaints pending, many of which are surely valid, even with the free market system. The broadcasters act as they care less about making money, as they do shoving indecency down everyone's throats as part of their deliberate and evil agenda to destroy children and even adult's freedom of choice
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:20 AM
Tactitus X, you clearly did not read the article before commenting. If you did, you'd see that Trueman hasn't claimed anyone is forcing him to watch anything. We not only have an absolute right to not watch indecency, we have an absolute right as homeowners to not even have access to it if we choose. And our buying and plugging in a TV doesn't invite indecency in. The Supreme Court found that the channel changer and on/off switch are not a viewer or listener's only recourse. The liberal mantra of "if you don't like it, turn it off" is incredibly mindless and tired. TV is not only for that small minority who want porn and indecency
In response to:

The Right to Decency

tnorth Wrote: Jul 18, 2012 9:16 AM
This is an absolutely superb article. The author is 100% accurate as to the law, facts, and all common sense aspects of the issue. There is nothing in this article that any person can sanely dispel. I and all others have an absolute right to decency and no one gets to dictate otherwise for us. Besides, who can argue with treating other humans with common decency? Only those who are inclined to violence, which indecency is a form of
1 - 8