In response to:

Usher In A Redefinition of Marriage, Usher Out Religious Liberty

Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 1:32 PM
US Supreme Court Case Loving V Virginia "The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men. Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, " Now the heart of that case was racial. The State of VA maintained a black could marry a non-white and a white could marry a white. The Court ruled that was a violation of Equal protection because they could not marry the consenting adult they chose.
HeraldOfGalactus Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 3:05 PM
Cambermeister, based on the court decisions cited by Tinsldr2, it is apparent based on legal precedent and the application of the 9th Amendment that marriage is a fundemental right. And as the 9th Amendment makes clear, the enumeration of certain powers in the constitution shall not be construed to deny those retained by the people. And ad hominum attacks against someone you don't agree with don't prove your point.
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 3:03 PM
You are camber because you cant defend your positions
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:48 PM
Tinsldr2, you stated; "the supreme Court has said is Fundamental.
That is the right to get married to the consenting adult of your choice"

Is this the truth Sir? Did the Supreme Court really make such a ruling?

Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:47 PM
Yes I did.

and i just showed it to you
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:41 PM
"the right to get married to the consenting adult of your choice"

This is what you stated; Tinsldr2.
ConcealedCarry Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:40 PM
I only lie when I sleep; you apparently make it a lifestyle. I feel sorry for your "wife" (if she's not just a figment of your twisted imagination).
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:36 PM
Lie after lie Concealed Carry, are you proud of yourself?

Please show where I equated the past treatment of Blacks with gays...

What I didnt but you were unable to counter my argument any other way?

What did I do? Camber asked a specific question. I answered that very specific question. I in no way equated the past plight of blacks with gays. I answered a specific question asked by Camber which is where the "Supreme Court has said is Fundamental. That is the right to get married "

Proud of yourself for lying Concealed Carry?
ConcealedCarry Wrote: Feb 12, 2013 2:27 PM
Reprehensible, dishonest, and vile racists stoop to disgusting lows when they compare the past treatment of blacks who were enslaved and segregated with the "plight" of gays who can marry anyone of the opposite sex they choose to marry.

Proud of yourself, Tinsldr2?

NOTE: This is the fourth column in a series of columns related to National Marriage Week, Feb. 7-14, 2013. The third column is available here.

Disagreements and projections abound in the dialogue about marriage and its redefinition to include same-sex couples. But both sides agree on one issue: redefining marriage significantly jeopardizes religious freedom—the first liberty upon which our nation was founded.

The convergence of several factors creates this unavoidable clash between religious liberty and redefining marriage. First, the vast majority of religious adherents in America believe that marriage is the union of one man and one woman. And because...