In response to:

Redefining Marriage Raises Concerns For Children and Society

Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 4:16 PM
The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. “It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.” Now that was on legalizing Homosexuality itself and not marriage, however. Conservative Justice Scalia said in the same Case " This reasoning leaves on pretty shaky grounds state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples." Consenting Adults is used repeatedly in the Court Decision, not children
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 5:51 PM
David rational people reading my post know it was a rebuttal to:

DCM in FL Wrote: 5 hours ago (12:38 PM)
This is why anyone who thinks they can put homosexuality on the "acceptable" list without eventually having to put pedophilia, etc., on it as well is fooling themselves.

Now in my post I said it was not directly about marriage but we have all seen numerous posts on articles like this that say if we let two women marry then children will be next. I was showing one example of MANY Supreme Court Decision decisions that children are not consenting adults, and used one specifically involving homosexuals because that is what DCM referenced.

Again who knows what camber is talking about. He is not rational
David3036 Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 5:28 PM
Who even KNOWS waht YOU are discussing? Imaginary Oval Office conversations? Urinals in the ladies' room? Your imaginary gay "friends" who just happen to be trying to adopt? "Straight" nomenclature, whatever that is?
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 4:26 PM
A post about improvised 'sex'. I thought we were discussing marriage?

NOTE: This is the sixth and final column in a series of columns related to National Marriage Week, Feb. 7-14, 2013. The fifth column is available here.

Much of the debate surrounding same-sex marriage asks about societal harms. Many advocates of the change quickly dismiss the question and insist that a redefinition of marriage won’t hurt anyone. But that conclusion proceeds from a misperception about what marriage is—a failure to grasp marriage’s role as a public institution that shapes our thoughts and actions.

Marriage is not merely a legal arrangement that bestows various benefits and...