1 - 10 Next
Any child rapist deserves the harshest jail sentence as it is a horrific crime. I would not be opposed to the death penalty in many such cases. But the fact remains that MOST child molestations are heterosexual male on female. A small number of child rapes are Female on Male although this category is often unreported. A same sex rape is no worse than an opposite sex rape and much less prevalent. Most people are not rapists and certainly not pedophiles and the same goes for Homosexuals. If this guy is guilty then he deserves jail. I have no reason to believe he is innocent but also have no reason to believe his guilt. I will let the legal system decide that, but you cannot use this as an indictment of all homosexuals anymore then you can use a female teacher that has sex with a male student as an indictment of female teachers or a man that abuses a young girl as an indictment against all men
you don't support the laws, but you do support those who openly put such laws in place and use them for their own benefit.......... Wrong again. I vote Republican and very occasionally libertarian and none of the people i have voted for in the last 30_ years support those laws nor do we have them in GA and I oppose them Federally So once again a false personal attack from someone that advocates doing away with ALL marriage laws
What is government's interest in encouraging couples to get married? Married couples , that stay married, are more financially stable as you know which increases the tax base and are better at raising children which is the foundation of a stable society as you know a few same sex couples getting married does not change that, it enhances it you want to take away the incentives for the foundation of society push for that and see how many Americans and especially politicians support you it wont be many if you push this from a pure libertarian perspective you would have a point but u literally want to throw the baby out with the bath water and cut off your nose to spite your face Rather then acknowledge that a few couples you disapprove of are able to get benefits you would deny them to all parties Good luck with that. I SUPPORT marriage
Society is in flux, due to useful idiots, like yourself, who have been blindly pushing for ridiculous "anti-discrimination" legislation, which could never pass an honest Constitutional review ................... Notice the false ad hominen attack? it is all people like anonimus can do I do not support anti-discrimination laws that effect any private business or any religious institution. If you don't want to serve someone for any reason you should not have to do so if you are a private business Blacks, whites, jews, Christians, atheist, gay straight, blondes, red heads ,old, young, it should not matter, you should be able to refuse them service. I do not support ANY law that forces people to do that. but I still come back to the FACT "no churches have been forced to perform same sex marriages in the USA"
correcting typos The gov discriminates against people all the time. As long as there is a compelling interest for the discrimination it is perfectly legal and ordinary There is a gov interest in encouraging couples to get married. The state gov has the ability to offer such contracts and the federal gov has the ability to offer benefits to those that have such contracts homosexuals are getting married and getting the same benefits from the gov that other married couples get. So what is your point?
the gov discriminates against people all the time. As long as there is a compelling interest for the discrimination it is perfectly legal ad ordinary There is a go interest in encouraging couples to get married. The state gov has the ability to offer such contracts and the federal gov has the ability to offer benefits to those hat have such contracts homosexuals are getting married and getting the same benefits from the gov that other married couples get. So what is your point?
redraider............ the Federal Gov has never forced any private citizen to perform services for gays. Those people are all forced to provide those services under state and local laws. I disagree with those state laws and think anyone should be able to serve whomever they want but those laws are not marriage laws and apply even when same sex coupes can not get legally married in the state your comment about assemble with whom you wish is gibberish to me. I am not lying you can assemble with anyone you want to, it has nothing to do with marriage
it is working out well as no churches have been forced to perform same sex marriages in the USA
The US Gov has not done any of those 3, can you give proof or cite examples?
Why must a pastor be forced to marry homosexuals?.................... none are being forced to do so. Since when does government get to dictate that a Baptist must accept sin in his church?........................ The Gov isn't telling that to any Church Since when does government get to dictate who must assemble with whom............ Assemble with whom you wish
1 - 10 Next