In response to:

Colin Powell Uses Code Words to Describe Republican Party

Tinsldr2 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 6:50 PM
You have reduced yourself to a conspiracy wingnut. You have shown NO proof that the founders meant wanted it to mean something different then it meant in the colonies. In the Colonies it meant Born in the colonies as a freeman regardless of your parents It IS YOU that does not want to adhere to what the Founders meant!! The states that ratified it, in EVERY ONE of the States, mere birth in the Colony meant they were natural born subjects. Now they became FREE States and not colonies, and Citizens not Subject. But there is no change in THEIR definition of natural born. Try doing some research. What is clear is born in a state in (as a Free man) in 1777 meant you were a natural Born Citizen just like it did in 1961.

Yesterday former Secretary of State Colin Powell told illegal magazine toter and Meet the Press host David Gregory that the Republican Party is having an "identity crisis" and said there is a "dark vein of intolerance" inside the GOP. He accused leaders in the Party of using "code words" to put down minorities as if his own "dark vein" reference wasn't code for something. He predictably slammed Sarah Palin and portrayed birthers as an influentail sector of the Republican Party (they're not).

On the birther thing, I'd like to remind...