In response to:

Liberal Logic: To Cut Spending You Have to Spend More

timothy53 Wrote: Jan 01, 2013 9:11 PM
What was it the Rep. primary candidates were being derided for 10 to 1 spending cuts to taxes. And the deal they are being asked to vote for is 41 to 1 spending increase to taxes how is that fair or a balanced approach?I'm not a no. guy so I could be looking at this wrong. could someone staighten me out.
h20skier2 Wrote: Jan 01, 2013 11:34 PM
I see why you are confused Timothy. You listened to what they said they would do with what they actually did. You are only supposed to listen to what they say and ignore what they do. It will be much simpler that way.
worker Wrote: Jan 02, 2013 8:38 AM
That's what the liberals do. Obama said this or that so it must be true, but in reality does something different and they pay no attention to that.

At the White House once I was regaling him with local news from Champaign (which he was always ready to hear), and I said, 'Blank is dead; his extremely disloyal sentiments so provoked his neighbors that there was serious talk of inflicting vengeance on him, and he was found dead in bed—caused largely by fright.' This man was an old Whig friend of Lincoln, but the reason of his exit from life's trials amused him. His comment was, 'He died, then, to save his life, it seems.'"- Lincoln's Own Stories, Anthony Gross, HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS NEW YORK AND LONDON, 1912