There's nothing intellectually challenging or unusual about poverty. For most of mankind's existence, his most optimistic scenario was to be able to eke out enough to subsist...
As always, and excellent article. However I’d like to argue that you are, in part, 100% wrong. (I love that non sequitur!) The statement “They were poor because our society creates poverty" is entirely correct. After I read your article I wondered just how the government defines “poverty.” So I popped off to the Census Bureau site to find the definition. Here are some interesting tidbits: “Poverty thresholds are the dollar amounts used to determine poverty status…. The same thresholds are used throughout the United States (do not vary geographically)…. If total family income is less than the threshold appropriate for that family the family is in poverty.” “Income Used to Compute Poverty Status … Excludes capital gains” [ie – if I sell a BI
Here's a recent statement frequently suggested by leftist academics, think tank researchers and policymakers: "People were not just struggling because of their personal deficiencies. There were structural factors at play. People weren't poor because they made bad decisions. They were poor because our society creates poverty." Who made that statement and where it was made is not important at all, but its corrosive effects on the minds of black people, particularly black youths, are devastating.
- D.C. cabs companies blame ride-sharing for loss of revenue Mary Katharine Ham 33 mins ago
- Pew poll: Majority of Republicans think GOP isn’t doing a good job on spending, immigration, and gay marriage Allahpundit 1 hour ago
- Ruth Bader Ginsberg to liberals: You really think Obama can replace me? Noah Rothman 1 hour ago
- Building blocks of the GOP Senate majority coming together Noah Rothman 2 hours ago
- Jim Webb: I’m seriously thinking of running for president as a Democrat Allahpundit 3 hours ago
- Climate change so important that cable news ignored Obama’s UN speech Noah Rothman 3 hours ago