In response to:

Missouri Dems: Let’s Just Force Gun Owners to Surrender, Destroy Their Weapons

Ticked Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 3:01 PM
I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on. “I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.” That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill.
Ticked Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 3:55 PM
8 pages.

If he's not lying, well then, he's just incompetent.
Tacitus X Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 3:47 PM
Any chance lawyer-politician Kline was simply lying?
SugarLandSteve Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 3:12 PM
This is exactly why we all need to keep in mind that the price of FREEDOM is eternal vigilance.

We need to keep these turds under the microscope and on a very short leash.
Ticked Wrote: Feb 18, 2013 3:01 PM
Kind of typical for liberals, they have to pass it to find out WHAT'S IN IT.

Why wait for the supply to dry up over time when you could just force gun owners to surrender or destroy their weapons immediately? Missouri Democrats think it’s a good idea:

Democrats in the state House have proposed a bill that would force gun owners to either surrender or destroy weapons including semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines and semi-automatic pistols with a fixed magazine that can shoot more than 10 rounds before being reloaded.

Ammunition-feeding devices that can hold more than 10 rounds also would be banned. Owners also could send their weapons to another...