Previous 31 - 40 Next
Why would Obama want to fix a problem he knowingly and deliberately created? The Democrats know what he is doing and agree with him. That is precisely why they will not support any measures sent to them that will help secure the border. The Democrat controlled Senate will make sure of that.
I have to chuckle at the questions asked: why weren't the planes armed, how come they couldn't find UAL 93, why did it take so long for info to trickle down, why is this story only coming out now? (If you lived in Israel it would have been different. They have been on a war footing for about a half century) Real life isn't as easy or as simple as the movies.
Presuming an aircraft is down, speculating an aircraft is down and confirming an aircraft is down are different things. Transitioning to a "war" footing within the 48 probably doesn't happen as quickly as it does in the movies. Commanders are likely bombarded with questions and info from every direction and it must be sorted out and prioritized. You don't have time to let everyone know what is going on. The decision makers are notified first everyone else finds out later.
Keep in mind he isn't dodging his opposition, he is dodging the people who would tune into the debate.
Ahunt sr. I believe Ayn Rand was an atheist and if so I don't think you could classify her as a communist, far from it.
Valid point. He should be allowed to reenlist without the words "so help me God".
Tsk, tsk. You can't use the "f" word with liberals. You know, it's that thing that liberals say doesn't exist when you talk about the pro-choice crowd.
In response to:

ISIS Seeks 'Cyber Caliphate'

tibby2 Wrote: Sep 12, 2014 9:12 AM
Of course what the jihadists can do is give recruits a downpayment on the 72 virgins they will receive as a martyr later. Kinda a payment in advance. Can anyone say: Boko Haram?
Liberals have gained the upper hand and are in power. Power is a narcotic that is highly addictive. Addicts will stop at nothing to get their next "fix".
"Congress shall make no law..." If you don't follow "the law" you are punished by government. That is what "the law" does. If the administrators are government and government enforces "the law", were any students pressured or forced to follow "the law" under penalty from the administrators of the university. When I hear of these cases it does not seem that the administrators forced any student under penalty of "the law" to wear the emblem but it does seem that the administrators, aka government, does forced the students NOT to wear the emblem. In this case the emblem is considered a religious symbol. If the group of individuals get together, in this case a sports team, and express through a religious symbol their remembrance of someone or beliefs and that is prohibited by government, then why can't an individual also be forced by government from being allowed to display a religious symbol on their person? Does government have any limit? What then is the purpose of the First Amendment if you are free to express yourself but only behind closed doors and out of sight of the public for fear of "offending" someone?
We know. Give our regards to your buddies at the NSA.
Previous 31 - 40 Next