You put people into a country that just overthrew their government and place them in an area known to be a hotbed for terrorists with no contingency plans?

Odd how the media knows so much about this guy and yet have never talked to a Benghazi survivor?

Actually I took his comment as a joke. With all the racial talk you hear from political leaders, here a guy was saying that this "pretty white girl" ran into the arms of a total (black) stranger in spite of all the racial rhetoric that abounds from those pander the race card. I think he was taking a poke at all of the P.C. crowd. Don't just read the words, listen to how he delivers them. Good for you Charles Ramsey !

The media is all over Cleveland trying to scoop each other on talking to the neighbors of a pervert that kept 3 women hostage for a decade. Yet how many of these same media "stars" sought to speak to any of the survivors of Benghazi during the last seven months? To me the silence of the lambs speaks louder than a possible coverup by this administration. It must be nice to have willing accomplices that need not be told what to do.

I think back at the news coverage of the "outing" of a covert CIA agent who was not a covert agent, merely an employee and compare that the press coverage in the aftermath of a U.S. embassy being overrun with 4 dead people including one ambassador. I also think what if these were Republicans instead of Democrats that were in the White House during Benghazi? I think many know the answer. Jefferson's wish is dead. We now have government "without" newspapers.

Remember the Hillary campaign ad with the ringing phone at 3 am? If she runs it will be a good one to use against her. Seems like neither she nor Obama answered the phone that morning.

"If you ain't takin flak then you ain't over the target". Inside the beltway is a target rich environment for stupidity.

When you fail to plan, you've planned to fail.

Becca freedom and responsibility are but two sides of the same coin.

The liberty minded want equality of opportunity. The collectivist minded want equality of outcome. Liberals don't want a "level playing field" they want movable goal posts. That is why you will never hear a clear definition of "fairness" or "fair share". Those are just code words for the redistributionist. It is just that simple.

Jbravo in response to my post of 0646 hrs asked: "military health care and pensions are free. does that make our service members moochers?" How long does it take for you to accumulate those military benefits? Can you get those benefits after a single term of enlistment? If you serve as an officer and fulfill your commitment after being commissioned what benefits do you get? If you want to put yourself on the same level as welfare queens then that is your choice but I value and respect those who served apparently more than you do. I put those who serve in a different category than the Sheila Jackson Lee supporters who think that everything is "free". If you served to protect the welfare handouts of the moochers who are nothing more than collectivists, while you may have courage you still are a collectivist. I can still respect your bravery but will never respect anyone who supports collectivism. If we become a socialist country then the Founders wasted their time and people no longer understand what a right really is. Rights do not come at the expense of others.