You misinterpret my point. I was pillorying AO's ridiculously stupid question, not criticizing conservative economic policy. The tard's alleged question was essentially a small speech followed by a specious punctuation, not a legitimate query.

didn't work out so well for Romney and when the Democrats took full advantage of it you all whined. ------------------------------------------------------- Lois, you ignorant slutt. Most conservatives objected to last year's election because the GOP supporters chose to nominate Romney, not because Obama raised the most money. Citizens United was directly responsible for getting Obama reelected, yet you leftists still complain about it. You twits love biting the hand that feeds.

How do you square the spirit of Pope Francis's core message to 'help the poor' with the entire right wing Republican/Conservative/Christian agenda in the form of Paul Ryan's and Mitt Romney's economic plans and Fox News' and supposedly "Christian" (owned by Salem Communications) Townhall's rhetoric is to penalize and victimize those less fortunate than ourselves? ------------------------------------------------------ Your question is void for long winded hyperbole, wild speculation as to whether or not conservatives actually pay attention to Fox News, asinine assumptions about the implications of certain economic policies, and a general farcical and condescending tone. Ask an honest, straight forward question for once.

For example, see tax policy, 'budget balancing' on programs for the less fortunate, resisting Obamacare (created precisely to HELP THE POOR), voter ID, refusal to regulate big banks, refusal to come out against Citizens United, on and on and on..... --------------------------------------------- Voter ID laws are perfectly constitutional. The ID laws that were overturned prior to last year's election were struck because of the concerns over accelerated time frames to obtain photo IDs, not the concept of having to provide such at the polls. Obamacare when phased in could cripple whatever recovery the economy may be experiencing. Citizens United is groovy and didn't prevent Obama from out fundraising Romney.

Tax Reform (i.e. more EQUAL), Job Creation, Obamacare, Banking reform, more dollars for early childhood eduction programs, over-turn of Citizens United, --------------------------------------------------- Citizens United is hardly the evil you sniveling leftists claim it to be.

You said you judge all religions b the actions of all religions.

No, I said all religions are full of nonsense and you judge both the religion and the actions of its adherents. Talking donkeys, burning bushes, men who fly plans into buildings. ALl must be judged. ---------------------------------------------- All must be judged by your subjective eyes and damned by implication. You were the one who held all religion responsible for the 9-11 attacks.

No one can prove or disprove God Thump. And you are apparently not rational. ------------------------------------------------------------ I already admitted this. Who's irrational, me who admitted the nature of religious faith or you who acts in a ridiculously subjective manner yet asserts they're being the only logical one capable of knowing the truth. Get over yourself.

A wholly subjective opinion in the face of the inability to prove whether or not the supernatural exists. Angry, you have not one objective bone in your body.

I hold flying planes into buildings to the same scrutiny that I do talking donkeys and burning bushes. What people believe is just as important as what they do. You seem to believe that I'm throwing out religions based on the acts of their adherents? If that was true there wouldn't be a one that could pass. As it stands, none of them pass regardless of that. -------------------------------------------------------- So, using your logic, the Buddhist is culpable for the 9-11 attacks, despite no link whatsoever in geography, philosophy, or world view. You are in no way objective.