In response to:

Obama's Disarm the Victim Movement

Thomas2124 Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 2:07 PM
Actually, if you look up the definition of "arms", you'll see it to be unrelated to any specific kind of weapon. The fact is, every single American has the right to bear any kind of arms -- though I government currently limits us. Think about this: Is the number of rounds in a gun going to save you from our tyrannical government using biological and nuclear weapons on its own citizens? Dont think that can happen? Tinfoil hat time you say? Perhaps so. But honestly, our government is steeped in tyranny now (to support themselves as a noble class) that I put nothing above them. I want our Constitutional government back. God help us attain that peacefully!
Mike2065 Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 2:52 PM
In fact when the 2nd Amendment was written arms meant everything including artillery.

The British romp through the MA countryside that led to Lexington and Concorde was in fact an attempt by the Brits to seize 2 cannon that were owned by the TOWN OF CONCORD! (not the MA Colonial Government)
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 5:59 PM
The Brits went to Concord to seize the armory and gunpowder making facility.
AudiR10 Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 2:42 PM
A couple of weeks ago a 16 year old in Alabama was arested with a bedroom full of IEDs that he'd made in the garage, out of tobacco tins and roofing nails and black powder. He got the design and the recipes from the Internet. You may have to get more creative, if you're the kind of person who meekly does what the goveernment orders you to do and turns in everything they want. But Americans always have been a creative lot.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 2:36 PM
its MORONIC to think that the gov't would use WMD on it's own citizens and cities.
First,the military would never go along with it.,because their relatives,friends,and neighbors would also be affected by it.
Second,use of WMD or tanks,artillery,and bombing would turn ALL the citizens against the gov't in a hurry.
Third,rebels are not going to go head to head with the military or police,they're going after the politicians,judges,gov't officials who passed and support such laws. they and their families will not be safe anywhere,it will be open season on them,KOS.
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 2:38 PM
BTW,some of those military support the Constitution,and they WILL bring heavy weaponry to the rebels. there's also the local National Guard armories and depots,controlled by the Governors of the several states.
Ms Kelly Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 11:09 PM

It’s happened in other countries. Sadam used WMD on his citizens. Don’t you think the relatives, friends and neighbors of the Iraqi military were effected? As for the whole country turning against the government…Gov. can spin something to sound like they were doing a service. Remember what happened to the Branch Davidian group. They hadn’t committed any crime at all, but they were blown away over nothing but suspicion. Even their kids got shot but the agents involved got off scot-free.
erick24 Wrote: Jan 16, 2013 10:28 AM
You need to watch "Innocents Betrayed."
And realize that WPMDs now include machine guns and small bombs.
Unarmed "citizens against the government" are just bleating sheep.
So now we’re learning that Barack Obama wants to make the sale of high capacity magazines illegal. How nice. Nice --- and easy to expose as completely absurd.

Let’s just use one occurrence to address the dream shared by Dear Ruler and liberals of eliminating these high-capacity magazines in rifles and handguns.

To show the absurdity of this idea, let’s just go back to Loganville, Georgia 11 days ago. Melinda Herman was at home with her two children in this suburban neighborhood. Her husband was at work. Suddenly someone was ringing her doorbell. She was expecting nobody. The...

Related Tags: Self Defense Barack Obama