In response to:

Doing the Research the New York Times Won't Do

Thomas2124 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 7:20 AM
I think the title of "newspaper" ought to be removed from the Time. It should be replaced with "tabloid" or "fan(atic) fiction".
everyonesfacts4usall Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 7:47 AM
Ummm, do you read it regularly?
Or just hear about it based on conservative commentators?
MB43 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 9:05 AM
regularly. i know more about the Times than you do about TH. If you want to defend the ridiculous Times article be bold enough to defend a specific point.
everyonesfacts4usall Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 2:20 PM
MB43, I was defending the paper.
Should papers, including a virtual paper like TH have opinion pieces some of them incorrect in their pages. I would say yes.
TH does all the time. NYT imo, less so, but still does especially without outside columnists who are not fact checked.

In Sunday's New York Times, Elisabeth Rosenthal claimed, as the title of her article put it, "More Guns = More Killing." She based this on evidence that would never be permitted in any other context at the Times: (1) anecdotal observations; and (2) bald assertions of an activist, blandly repeated with absolutely no independent fact-checking by the Times.

There is an academic, peer-reviewed, long-term study of the effect of various public policies on public, multiple shootings in all 50 states over a 20-year period performed by renowned economists at the University of Chicago and Yale, William Landes and John...

Thursday, May 23 | 03:30 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:30 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:30 AM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 03:30 AM ET