In response to:

Nice Try Shrum, but Obama Ain't Truman, and this Ain't 1948

The Teleprompter Speaks Wrote: Jun 19, 2012 2:06 PM
Except the "Bush tax cuts" (aren't they the Obama tax cuts now, he signed them into law when they were going to expire in 2010) brought in more revenues. Now why would we want to increase tax revenues.
king10 - exposing leftism Wrote: Jun 19, 2012 7:44 PM
Not obviously to the trolls.
D G Wrote: Jun 19, 2012 3:09 PM
Raising tax RATES does not mean raising tax REVENUE.


Democrat political consultant Robert Shrum tried paint Mitt Romney yesterday as another Thomas Dewey, who lost to Harry Truman in 1948 after being favored going into the fall.

In the Daily Beast, Shrum calls Romney “the little man on the wedding cake,” “stiff” and a few other things that look like a Hail Mary designed to paint Mitt as out of touch.

But more important than who is Thomas Dewey in 2012 is the question who, in this scenario, will play the part of the no-nonsense Truman in a “Dewey Defeats Truman” reprise.

Because it ain’t Obama.


Related Tags: Obama