In response to:

Chambliss on Benghazi Hearing: ‘So Obvious’ It Was a Terrorist Attack

The Sloandog Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 7:07 AM
Well here we are .Think of the people in leadership of this country. The only one that seemed semi sane was Petraeus,although as soon as he took that CIA position I was a little suspect. I expect no closure here and no truthfulness.There is not one "statesman" or anyone with integrity in this administration.
Chestertonfan Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 7:17 AM
There used to be statesmen in the Democratic Party, didn't there? Am I wrong? If not, then where did they go?
James____Tx Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 7:19 AM
Funny, I think they turned Republican.
adelegas Wrote: Nov 16, 2012 11:19 AM
Bill Clinton and Carter I'd consider statesmen. What Republican statesmen are left? H.W. Bush maybe definitely not W. Bush.

Lawmakers on intelligence committees met behind closed doors today to get a more detailed account of what happened during the September 11th attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, which left four Americans dead.

In closed-door sessions, lawmakers got their most comprehensive account to date of what happened on the ground in Benghazi on September 11, a senior intelligence official told CNN. They also heard an explanation as to what U.S. officials were doing behind the scenes to respond, the official said, adding that the presentation would clarify some mischaracterizations about the nature of the attack.

...