Liberals are the offspring of Satan.......now there's that rational, non-emotional thinking that Prager always insists comes from the right.

Michael...good stuff. And...if you hadn't sowed your wild oats back then (to use an old phart term), you'd be able sit here today all pizzed off and frustrated that others are having a good time, just as Prager does in this column.

I would counter that women would only have "damaged self respect" if they spend too much time listening to bible thumpers telling them how they SHOULD act and feel. Why shouldn't women be "allowed" to go out, and have fun as they see fit? And, once you are able to accept that premise, that pretty much eliminates them having "damaged self respect". Some people need to get over the belief that women could never enjoy having sex (gasp...outside of marriage) and, as such, they're only getting used when they engage in it.

I would counter that women would only have "damaged self respect" if they spend too much time listening to bible thumpers telling them how they SHOULD act and feel. Why shouldn't women be "allowed" to go out, and have fun as they see fit? And, once you are able to accept that premise, that pretty much eliminates them having "damaged self respect". Some people need to get over the belief that women could never enjoy having sex (gasp...outside of marriage) and, as such, they're only getting used when they engage in it.

DCM..."will have" or "might have"....and exactly what type of adverse effects are you referring to?

DCM.........................not true. I believe that an 85 year old couple should be allowed to marry just as a 21 year old couple but that doesn't mean that I think that an 85 year old and a 21 year old are "interchanageable". And, on a personal note, although I strongly feel that a same sex couple should have all the same rights that my wife and I have, I do not, for one second, think that it would be the same for me to be married to a man.

Raven...................well, if you'll notice, Prager doesn't site any examples of these people who supposedly believe that "there are no significant natural differences between men and women". If there are any such people, they are a TINY % of the population. If you listen to Prager, however, you would think that pretty much every college grad believes this.

I have visions of how, many years ago, this very judgemental guy is walking around campus wearing his yarmulke while carrying his accordian around, and having NO luck at all with the women on campus....and this column is the result. We're talking about 18-22 years olds. Let them have their fun for God's sake. In time, they WILL get married, have kids, buy houses, etc etc etc.

what are you talking about...what specifically did I not hear properly? I'm always amazed at the number of posts like yours in this forum. Why bother making a very vague, unspecific post about me "not hearing properly". If you think I'm wrong about something or mis-heard something, tell me exactly what it was. If your point is that Prager DID condemn those fellow conservatives for their stances, give me the specifics...hell, I'd have a bit more repsect for him as a result.

To Prager's credit, he did commend B. Maher for his comments.....but...has Prager shown the same intellectual integrity by calling out some of the nuts from "his" side, including Alex Jones and Glenn Beck , who are claiming that the Boston bombing was a gov't run operation? Perhaps he has....I don't listen every day.......but, if he has, I sure haven't heard it.

Chries......you're making it sound as if it was an "either or" situation..the admin did not have the option of EITHER protecting American lives OR pointing to a video as the cause.