In response to:

Here We Go: Diane Feinstein to Introduce Legislation to Ban Semi-Automatic Weapons

theoriginalbryce Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:53 AM
No BigDog the 2nd Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms. It is only in the eyes of extremist like yourself that consider it a license to own any weapon.
Earl29 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:58 AM
I do not consider it a right to own a howitzer. The right is to own a weapon an ordinary soldier would carry in combat.
Bigdogoffthechain11 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:57 AM
I am not an "extremist"; I am an AMERICAN. Do not again employ that term in connection with me, you nazi PIG. The heritage of the land, and its founding documents are CRYSTALLINELY CLEAR-even for nazi morons LIKE YOU. As you clearly don't know what you're talking about-why don't you just S T F U and read the law, and LEARN SOMETHING. Nazi PIG.
Duke Nuk'em Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:55 AM
Hey comrade!

Define "arms" !
TaxFree1031 Wrote: Dec 17, 2012 9:54 AM
Including your collection of exotic spears

When Congress is back in session in January, California Democrat Diane Feinstein plans to introduce legislation to ban the import, export, manufacturing, sale and transfer of what she calls "assault weapons." Feinstein didn't get into specific detail about what weapons would be affected, after all the term "assault" is a political one and the proper name for the guns Feinstein is trying to ban is "semi-automatic," which can include both handguns and rifles. Feinstein told NBC's David Gregory yesterday that ammunition clips holding more than 10 bullets would be banned should her bill become law.

“It [the...