In response to:

PETA: Hunting Magazines Are Worse Than Porn, You Know

The Original Alice Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 9:39 PM
Interesting [and good] points, Mike. While I bet you won't like it, I use the Bible as my moral compass. God's very clear on his treatment of women - that we are precious, and the treatment mandated for us was *radical* in Biblical times. Re: animals and our eating of them - that came with the Fall. That had not been God's original plan, but Sin brought about death. But it is the system now, and we have been made stewards over the animals. This means we are to treat them ethically - but not equally. If experimenting on them will cure cancer, AIDS, or feline leukemia, the greater Good wins.

PETA has been causing trouble for years, but in recent days we've seen them target children by comparing turkeys to the family dog, we've seen them beg President Obama to not pardon the turkey at the White House and now, they're trying to make the argument that hunting magazines are worse than porn. 

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is encouraging national retailer Hudson News to put hunting magazines where children can’t see them -- because, “Like other forms of casual or thrill violence, hunting spawns a dangerous desensitization to the suffering of others.”

Related Tags: Hunting PETA