Previous 11 - 20 Next
From In another incident involving Tracy Schmaler, after Elena Kagan was nominated by Obama for the Supreme Court, she (Kagan) tried to cover up her involvement with ObamaCare decisions so she would not have to recuse herself from any Supreme Court decisions involving the legislation. One email from Kagan read, “This needs to be coordinated. Tracy [Schmaler], you should not say anything about this before talking to me.” Former Department of Justice attorney J. Christian Adams has called Schmaler “the truth-challenged head of the Office of Public Affairs who disassembles the truth to the public on so many issues I have lost count.”
From The Obama Timeline: The legal memorandum releases by the White House which claims Obama has the authority to act as he has announced argues that “although there are approximately 11.3 million undocumented aliens in the country,” it only “has the resources to remove [deport] fewer than 400,000 such aliens each year.” Even if those estimates are correct, however, the ability to deport only 400,000 individuals per year does not mean those who are not deported can legally be given work permits, Social Security numbers, or other benefits normally limited to citizens and legal immigrants. (The logic of Obama’s excuse if pathetic. If, for example, the FBI only has sufficient manpower and resources to apprehend 60 percent of all counterfeiters, that does not mean the phony currency printed by the other 40 percent should be considered legal tender.)
It is worth reminding everyone that in May 2001’s unnamed White House insider provided behind-the-scenes information on the decision to go after Osama bin Laden: “Please get this out ASAP. Want specific people to know we know. RE Osama Bin Laden. Significant push to take him out months ago. Senior WH [White House] staff resisted. This was cause of much strain between HC and Obama/[Valerie] Jarrett. HC [Secretary of State Hillary Clinton] and LP [CIA head Leon Panetta] were in constant communication over matter—both attempted to convince administration to act. Administration feared failure and resulting negative impact on [Obama].” (That is, Obama did not want a repeat of Jimmy Carter’s failed Operation Eagle Claw of April 24, 1980, in which eight U.S. servicemen were killed in a botched attempt to rescue 52 American hostages from the U.S. embassy in Tehran, Iran. Obama, fearful of yet another comparison with Carter, preferred leaving bin Laden free to risking an embarrassing failure.) The insider continues, “Intel [the intelligence community is] disgusted over politics over national security. Staff resigned/left. Check timeline to corroborate. Now Intel already leaking to media facts surrounding how info obtained. Namely from enhanced interrogation efforts via GITMO prisoners. Obama administration placed in corner on this. Some media aware of danger to [Obama] RE this and [are] attempting protection. Others looking for further investigation. We are pushing for them to follow through and already meeting with some access. Point of determination [was] made FOR Obama not BY Obama. Will clarify as details become more clear. Very clear divide between Military and WH. Jarrett marginalized 100% on decision to take out OBL [Osama bin Laden]. She played no part. BD [then-chief of staff William Daley] worked with LP and HC to form coalition to force [Obama] to engage. IMPORTANT SPECIFIC: When 48 hour go order issued, [Obama] was told, not requested. Administration scrambled to abort. That order was overruled. This order did not originate from [Obama]. Repeat—this order did not originate from [Obama]. He complied, but did not originate. Independent military contacts have confirmed. Stories corroborate one another. This is legit. The killing of Osama Bin Laden was in fact a Coup within Obama WH. Speaking with additional contacts RE info.”
I have in-laws in Brazil, and its lesbian, socialist president, Dilma Rousseff has a scheme going involving Cuban "doctors." The Brazilian government (that is, the taxpayers) paid the Castro regime to get Cuban doctors to "volunteer" to treat poor Brazilians in remote regions. Of course, the "treatment" consists mostly of distributing communist propaganda. Rousseff has a criminal record for terrorism. Nevertheless, she was re-elected on October 26 because the Brazilians who rely on federal handouts exceed the number of working stiffs who pay the taxes.
How do you like working as a troll from the White House basement? When you're not at the keyboard, do they make you clean up after Bo, Sunny, and Michelle?
Do it with your own money, not mine.
Fine, do both. But what right do they have to use government force to make others pay for the care of their children?
Fine. Pay for it with your own money. Why do the taxpayers have to subsidize pre-school for others? Why do people without kids have to subsidize those who do? If you want kids, pay for them out of your own pocket.
Regan's divorce is irrelevant to the issue of Obama's communist parents and mentors. Hate? Yes, we hate socialism and communism.
From Pushing government pre-schools, Obama says, “Moms and dads deserve a great place to drop their kids off every day that doesn’t cost them an arm and a leg.” (That government pre-school would cost less than private pre-school is ridiculous. Wherever the children are placed there are costs: rent, utilities, salaries, insurance, etc. Whether it is the government agency or a private business paying those bills, those bills exist. Additionally, government employees tend to receive higher wages and benefits than employees in the private sector. Thus, the per-child cost of government pre-school would likely be higher than the cost at a privately-run facility. What Obama wants, of course, is not for the parents to pay for the pre-school directly; he wants the taxpayers to pay for the pre-schools. He wants to spread the cost among all taxpayers—regardless of whether they have children. As a result, people who have no children would be paying part of the day-care costs of people who do have children, and working Americans would be paying all of the costs of non-working Americans with children. Obama is essentially arguing for socialism.)
Previous 11 - 20 Next