I can answer you. Ryan H is referring to one of his hero's first plans for dealing with what he called the "Jewish problem". He first considered sending the jews to Madagascar. But he eventually discarded this plan in favor of what he called the "Final Solution": the complete extermination of "the Jewish race". Hitler was able to wipe out half of the World's Jews. If the Ryans of the World have their way, the Islamists will soon wipe out the other half. Does that answer your question?

"Who let all of those crazy people tell the rest of us what to do?" That's easy. The American people. They elected him in 2008, remember? Now if you're asking WHY on God's green Earth the American people could be so incredibly stupid that they could even think about electing this man, I have no idea.

Yes, we armed Turkey, which has had a pro-Western and pro-American foreign policy for the last hundred years or so. So you think that was a mistake because Turkey has become increasingly anti-West for the last couple years or so. We armed Egypt, which followed a pro-American foreign policy for the last 40 years and has had a detente with Israel for the last 30 years. But you think that was a mistake because Egypt has become increasingly anti-West in the last year. We "messed with" Iran, i.e., forced the Soviets to end their occupation of Iran in 1945 and pursued an alliance with Iran for 35 years. You think that was a mistake because in 1979, anti-Western, anti-American, and anti-Israel Islamists took over Iran. I disagree.

Your posts are not even vaguely coherent. Example: you describe the Republican Party as "colonial, imperialist, JimCrow, and white supremacy". That is so far from reality, I can only wonder what planet you're living on.

A two-party system is the best system, PROVIDED that the two parties are different and therefore offer the voters a choice. The reason I say this is because an election, by its very nature, cannot efficiently offer more than 2 alternatives. From the individual's point of view, either the candidate he prefers will win, or somebody else will win; somebody that he doesn't prefer. That will be the result, whether we have 2 parties or 200 parties. I repeat, an election, by its very nature, cannot effectively offer more than 2 alternatives.

I'm a Republican. And I don't believe I'm the first one you found.

The Gulf of Tonkin incident was NOT phony. On August 2, 1964, North Vietnamese PT boats attacked a U.S. destroyer, the U.S.S. Maddox. Since you don't believe our own government, why don't you llok up what North Vietnam has to say about the incident. They not only admit, they celebrate it. August 2 is a national holiday in Vietnam to commemorate what you call a "phony incident.'

I propose a new Law of Social Science. I will name it Sowell's Law (unless someone comes up with a better name). Sowell's Law states, "It is impossible for a black person in modern America to develop average, or above average intelligence, without being labelled a "sellout" or an "Uncle Tom" by the media.

Our system, as designed by the Founding Fathers, is NOT supposed to iognore political realities; it is supposed to RESPOND to the political realities. To scold Congress for responding to the current political climate is pointless. The problem is NOT with Congress; it is with the current political climate. And when we talk about the political climate, we're talking about the state of mind of the American electorate.

"Are we forgetting that people were murdered because of Operation Fast and Furious?" On Town Hall? No. For the American people? I'm afraid the answer is "yes". "Do these lives not matter?" On Town Hall? Yes For the American People? I'm afraid the answer is "no".