1 - 10 Next
we "know" Beck, Krauthammer et all are not caving to Islam.

If they weren't they shouldn't have criticized the Dutchman AT ALL.

In the first Place, much as I respect Beck, he deconstructs his OWN argument about there BEING no REAL left and right, or more specifically that left and right are both AT THE SAME PLACE by continuing to TALK about left and right. His cognitive dissonance on this is DEAFENING!
He needs to go back to Hayek and STAY there.

In the second place, The ONLY statements about the never to be sufficiently damned Raghead Jihadi Sandnazis I accept are the ones that say: “I would burn them ALL alive after stuffing them with chitlins, only I value the Constitution just sufficiently more than the...
A thoughtful, cogent, observer notes that the columnist credits the greater awareness of the "Human" face of abortion with the shift in public opinion.
In other words, as people got to SEE "the sausage being made" an act that was inherently vile and abhorrent could no longer be disguised as anything else.
It became clear to me within 2 weeks of the start of my first semester at Duke Divinity that keeping the “sausage making” out of the Prhomo debate was the control at the center of the chessboard.
One noted HomoSEX was NEVER to be discussed, only “Justice” and “Love.”
Fear of reprisal kept me silent at Duke.
None of you have that leverage over me.
And so I will out, as I have above, the “sausage works”, EVERY time an...
The flaw in extending the argument of course, is exactly the point the columnist makes. As long as the Prhomos keep it in the bedroom, nobody IS hurt. And nobody really cares how much of their own elimination they ingest off other male's members. Long as they use mouthwash to get the sheitecumsperm smell outa their mouth before they go out in public.
But the other posters tell it like it is. The Prhomos are not about keeping it in the bedroom, they are about Forcing the rest of us to Warrant, Legitimize, and NORM their perversion. It is the opposite of Justice or Civil Rights it is a kind of Tyranny.
And it will be resisted.
Spin as they will, God still says queersex is a kind of Debauched, Depraved and Degenerate Idolatry...
In response to:

Whose Values?

The Big Mick53 Wrote: Mar 12, 2010 8:14 AM
The Big Mick

I would also point out that any system of Justice that starts from the assumption that "a competent defense" REQUIRES an indifference to the Guilt of the defendent is inherently UNJUST
not to mention inherently hypocritical and unTruthful.

UnJust "Justice" is a sore point with God.
Ranks up there with Idolatry and ripping people off.

Mick

In response to:

Why Obama's Great Bet Will Fail

The Big Mick53 Wrote: Feb 28, 2010 10:42 PM
I've argued that YObaMao is merely a Southside Chi-Town Gangsta Hood Ward Heeler and that as long as his "constituency" was the Homies GETTING the green he was shaking out of The Man he was golden. The minute his "constituency" BECAME The Man who was being squeezed for The Green, he ain't doing so hot.

To put it another way, Pharaoh B'HO is all about, and about nothing else BUT "stickin it to The Man."

Now that America has woken up to how bloody stupid it is to give your credit card to a strange black man from the Southside Chi-town Gangsta Hood, the honeymoon with his Long Black Thing is OVER. The pain of reality has replaced the Romance of Fantasy.

Mick
In response to:

Why Obama's Great Bet Will Fail

The Big Mick53 Wrote: Feb 28, 2010 10:32 PM
say ACORN is the model for the "mainstream black" political mind.

Mick
In response to:

Why Obama's Great Bet Will Fail

The Big Mick53 Wrote: Feb 28, 2010 10:28 PM
I always said he was a Black Racist and a Red Marxist.

But I was thinking the NY Gov guy who got his staffer off a wife beating charge was more representative.

On the other hand I did point out before the election that the Track Record of "chocolate" governance in "chocolate towns" was something that should give voters pause before they applied it Nationally. DC under Barry, NY under Dinkins, Detroit, New Orleans, not exactly models of efficiency and progress.

Mick
Why would being consistent in one's Constitutional Conservationist beliefs demand support of slavery? Since Constitutional Conservationists are all about God endowed Individual Inalienable Liberty I would think just the opposite would be true.

On what cogent, logical, reasoning do you arrive at the conclusion that regarding Homosex as an abomination requires the State to execute its practitioners?

That homosex is a sin regarded by God as a kind of debauched, depraved and degenerate Idolatry doesn't take a Conservative or a Deranged point of view to ascertain. It's a pretty straightforward reading of the Christian Texts.

You can choose to blow them off, but accepting them at face value doesn't require any kind of...
The cogent objective observer, reading NYMH’s 6:16 puerile attempt at a simultaneous ad hominem AND straw man argument directed at Acton, and then encountering his ad hominem non rebuttal rebuttal to Anne at 7:25 wonders on EXACTLY what INTELLECTUAL basis NYMN would ARGUE against Acton’s point.

Does The Declaration not Found our very EXISTENCE, and the Constitution which subsequently organizes it, on the Principle of SELF-governance Acton quotes? Is NYMH arguing that the Founders ERRED in postulating that GOD endowed RIGHTS are INALIENABLE, that NO Government, that is N-O NO, Government ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, has the Right to Abridge them and it is the RIGHT of THE PEOPLE to RESIST such abridgement? Is he arguing that a Freely...
In response to:

A Cure for Character

The Big Mick53 Wrote: Feb 28, 2010 7:47 PM
If the Docs play this right than ALL Lawyers will end up defined as mentally ill and they'll never be another medical malpractice suit EVER.

Mick
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, June 03 | 03:35 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 03:35 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 03:35 AM ET
Sunday, June 03 | 03:35 AM ET