last night was The Ten Commandments.
"I your Pharaoh, God among Men and Beloved of the Peasantry, have spoken: 'So let it be written, so let it be done!'"

mick

I’m standing with the Founders at Home Plate, with the Declaration, God endowed INALIENABLE, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, the Constitution, the Bill of RIGHTS. For Jeffersonian Radical Limited Government (especially FED Gov) and Constitutional Conservationism. For Originalist Strict Constructionism.
Home Plate is where it has ALWAYS been. So is Center Field. Just because the Moronic Mythical “Middle” “Moderates”, (4ms) sniffing after the Commieqrs* cycle after cycle, like beeches in heat, have climbed OVER the Left Field Wall, OUT the back of the Stadium, DOWN the Dark Alley, UNDER the Manhole and INTO the Sewer does not render Home Plate “right wing” or “extreme” in any way.

*commieqr is my semantically accurate usage for the...

trashed the whole "Left-Right" Linear Political Spectrum Model in the 40s! and demonstrated how it is a Commieqr* LIE meant to cover THEIR totalitarian agenda. Various Libertarian writers like L.Neil Smith in the 70s and 80s pointed out the same thing. Tom Wolfe in the Millennial Issue of time pointed out that Hitler and Stalin were Fraternal if Fratricidal Collectivist Statist Twins.
Pat Caddell and Daniel Hannah MEP agreed on this point MONTHS ago on Beck.

And yet Glenn will still fall into the old model of saying "I get criticized from "The Left and The Right."

I'm still waiting for somebody to SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY for me WHO is to Glen's "right" and WHAT they hold as Principles and Agendas that Glenn does...

more questions later,
got to go
mick

I don't buy that I don't articulate my own arguments. You can check out my long abandoned The Big Mick Blog on TH if you want to continue to make that case.
Note, for instance The Big Mick Pledge for Candidates.

If you "know what it is like" to be on the receiving end of the disaprobation of people who disagree with you then you and I share a point of view.

I have no way of knowing if "the Birthers" have a cogent argument or not, I DO know that I prefer Primary Source Documents and Primary Source eyewitness and when people WON'T produce them, especially people who lie like the proverbial Dear Little Friend of Whoopi Goldberg DLFOWGB, pronounced Dilfogs, I am suspicious. Further I find arguments that "well they won't...

"You CAN almost see Charlie "over the glasses and down the nose" GIBSON.

mick

What did I say that led you to the inference that I think "all libertarians" think alike.
Whatever I said that implied that was "inartful".

I see a broad spectrum of Libertarians from my Favorite L.Neil Smith, through, TV's Andy Levy and Glen Beck to what I call the PsuedoliberTINEaryan, Kiddie Porn and Potters.

My own position extends Libertarianism to Anarchy and adds a Theological Element I don't find in most Libertarians.

I admit (YOU can get me to cop to almost anything) that I am unfamiliar with "Rothbardianism" and that you caught me covering up that lack of knowlege. So, who is he and what does he eat?
(Anybody remember the Wide Mouth Frog joke?-50 pts I'm keeping real score now Chuck ME is in the lead...

There ya go, I point it out again, the
“I don’t like THOSE people sitting at MY table” response.
Tinsldrs last spin: “THAT type of Mentality against ALL of us”.

As to “types of mentality” the concerted effort on this thread to marginalize to extinction “the Birthers”, puts me in mind of the scent, the shade, the tone, of the “we know better than the unwashed trailer trash” Commieqr Elitist Effete. One cannot almost see Charlie “over the glasses and down the nose.”
I don’t buy the Commie LIE, “see the crazy Birther Right Wing Religious Nut CONSERVATIVES”, so I don’t buy the “crazy morons make US LOOK BAD!” either.

Won’t!

Just makes ME want to keep saying: “Keep wearing those white greaser socks, sitting...

Hmmm, would that be to insure an Order of Succession should be have a Tom Clancy "Debt of Honor" moment?

mick

Thanks for unpacking your Libertarianism and Foreign Policy principles.
As usual I find them cogent, you arguments nearly unassailable, and all of it insightful.
You must be a helluva lawyer, up to your Standard as a Model.
I see your point of view, and do not gainsay it.
I just can’t live there.
I buy the “All men endowed by their Creator with inalienable rights” whole hog.
I acknowledge that many cultures are hostile to the notion and would have to be, or had to be, utterly destroyed before Free Individuals could/can flourish.
However, you have heard me say before that I extend M.L. King Jr: “A threat to Liberty anywhere is a threat to Liberty everywhere is a Threat to mine.” I extend Lincoln: “This Planet cannot...