that part of my post was a quote of WHR Bill 10:30.
My intention was to argue against his position.
Though I would say I shed not a tear for every fellow Fascist Socialist Statist Collectivist that the Nazis slew in the Fratricidal Struggle with the Red Commies. If the 1.5 million Jews in question WERE believing commies, tough grits.
If they were NOT then I share your outrage.

Indeed I argue that the Best American Policy would have been encouraging Hitler and Stalin to bleed each other to the death of their Regimes and egging on the Japs to help so THEY went down too.

mick

Plats concludes with an exquisite piece of self-deconstruction:
"These people, Muslim jihadists, know only fear, and carpet bombing any settlement where even one terrorist is found is the way to frighten them into reasonable submission."

d'accord, Plats! And how have I NOT been SAYING that? How does THIS differ from the "all guilty" barbarity you accuse ME of? On what basis do you refuse to acknowledge that there IS a terrorist in EVERY village, and THEY know who they are! It is THEIR KIN!
Tell me, how did you feel about the Feds using flame throwing tanks to burn the Koreshi babies? Mao said "The Revolutionary (jihadi) swims in a sea of peasants. When you cover for a jihadi you ENABLE a jihadi. I simply hold accountable...

then slams the door: “BigMyk, We the People have serious work to do to elect responsible people to represent us in 2010. If we act quickly and vote EVERY incumbent out, replacing them with “freedom firsters”,”
No argument there, but I continue to point out I haven’t seen these “freedom firsters” anywhere yet, nor am I inclined to believe ANY pol. Give me a Doc or a Cop or a Pipe Fitter who has never been in Politics. Give me ‘Cuda. Other wise I vote “none of the above.”
And I point out that even if you dump em in 2010, they’ll be back in 2012. They always come back. You don’t vote out Ruling Class Aristos, you guillotine them. You don’t vote away Flesh Eating Zombies, you burn them. You want to save the Republic, you are going to...

“Interestingly, I had a disagreement with Big Myk about abortion in the first trimester of gestation and he expressed, (with his usual clever wordsmithing his disdain) as much squeamishness about that, as he is now expressing reprehensible sadistic extermination of every Muslim on Earth. How is that different from Hitler and his hatred for Jews?”
Don’t confuse a deconstruction of your flatulent argument defining Life by Spacial Location as “squeamishness” Plats, my opposition to Baby Killing is on Constitutional and Declaration Grounds. The RIGHT of a Human being God endowed with INALIENABLE–you DO know what inalienable means, right? RIGHT to LIFE and LIBERTY. You can choose who you let in between your legs, Plats, you don’t have the...

TH regulars could have warned you about the rhetorical dangers of calling yourself to my attention, Annie Plats, but since you seem to want to engage you got it coming. I’d rather be taking my Sunday Nap but you have annoyed me.

PlatAnnie say: “Sorry, but I can’t agree 100% with the likes of bloviators like Big Myk. He sounds sadistic and barbarian. He apparently enjoys hand-to-hand combat and “live boiling in oil” vs. Dresden style carpet bombing.” Heard of the Rape of Nanking, Plats? The Bataan Death March? The Final Solution? Carpet Bombing Dresden, Fire Bombing Tokyo, Dropping Two, count em, 2, nukes IS WHAT IT TOOK TO STOP THOSE BARBARIANS.
You do what it TAKES, sweetheart, or you ENABLE them!

“Dirty bombs in...

I consider that I have made a prima facie case, here and elsewhere that IslamoFascism, the Sandnazi Jihadis, have as their Implacable Goal the establishment of Worldwide IslamoFascist Hegemony in a Global Radical Islamic Caliphate. This is based on their own stated intentions.
This is identical to the Aims of the Totalitarian States in WWII differing only in the God being served. You, bilbo, propose the SAME non-solution to the same KIND of People doing the same KIND of thing in apparent Denial of their stated Intentions and seem to believe somehow, this time, things will turn out different. I consider that to be asinine. On what basis do YOU defend Isolationism?
If you got a cogent argument in favor of it, “cough it up...

“You might even consider that history does not always repeat itself “exactly”, and that even if the non-interventionists of 1941 were wrong, that does not in itself provide proof positive that the non-interventionists of 2010 are wrong.”
So we are to conclude that if it pharts like a Duck and Sheites like a Duck it really isn’t a Duck, eh?
How is Isolationism in the 21st Century different in ANY way from Isolationism in the 20th, Billbutt? THAT burden of proof is on YOU! How is “intervention” not a CODE WORD for “Neo-Con Jewish Banker Conspiracy” as many people who TALK your code words seem to think?!
How do you differ from the Paul Potters and the Flat(ulent) Pat Earth Buckyballers who CAN be said to have had Anti-Semitic...

“I for one am not convinced that even the leaders of the non-interventionist "America First" movement were motivated by anti-Semitism or other evil motives. They may have been short-sighted and mistaken, given the situation of the time, but I don't think they actively wanted to see Hitler win or to see Jews harmed.” Remember, please, that the Holocaust-- the deliberate mass extermination of Jews in death camps-- did not begin in earnest until 1942, after America was already in the war.
How short sighted to you have to be to recognize Tyranny when you see it? How is permitting evil to flourish not an enablement of evil? What did they think Hitler was going to DO? How deep do you have to go into Mein Kampf and his speeches to see...

Bilbo, you got no idea how tough it is for me to be polite to your personae.
Your are teetering on the very edge of talking nonsense, if not over into the abyss, and I have NO patience with that. It is difficult not to leap from the vapidness of your ideas to the nature of your person (or of the person of your author’s personae) but I will try and content myself with a mere rhetorical drubbing in the form of a Big Mick Deconstruction.

Billy writes: “So Stokes is saying that three-fourths of the American public were anti-Semitic and pro-German? Rather than that they disagreed with the interventionists of the time about how to defend America and what was in the best interests of America?”
Arguing to Infinity, Bilbo. Produce...

You wait in vain, comrade.
You ain't gonna get one.
That's why I'm voting either 'Cuda or "none of the above."
Mick