1 - 10 Next
It seems that Ridley Scott, usually a pretty reliable diretor, has decided to completely ruin previously-released stories in film. First, he screws up The Taking of Pelham 1-2-3." Now he wants to do the same to an otherwise compelling Biblical narrative.
Short answer to the question posed: If you can't deal with reality, just change the label.
Butbutbut. . .John Kerry said we have them on the ropes. Obama said they're on the run. How can this be?
The only thing one needs to keep in mind is the reality of political math. Whenever a politician says it will cost X, figure at least 3X as the actual price; whenever he says it will save X, figure the number "0."
It seems to me that, following this, the Lena Dunham fiasco, and earlier the Duke lacrosse team, that the new default question to follow any accusation from the left has to becomes, "But is it true?" These guys undermine their own crusade with BS.
Is this a set of instructions that Democrats really need? After all, they seem to "embrace government" so well and so willingly already.
An interesting note on the body cameras: here in Los Angeles, when a recording exonerated a (very disciplined) police officer from charges of "racism" by some piddling actress no one knows after she was humping her boyfriend in public, many on the left said that the only reason he behaved well was because he knew he was on the record. Even giving them what they want does not placate these grinning idiots.
Problem is that many doing the burning do not live there but can go home afterward.
"No justice; no peace" fits much better on a sign than "If I don't get what I want, I'm gonna trash the place."
Now Jay Leno has really made an already-bad situation even worse. Being fearful is one thing; lying about it kills any future credibility.
1 - 10 Next