In response to:

Three Views on Same Sex Marriage

THE_ANSWER Wrote: May 21, 2012 9:31 PM
... and lastly...if calcium did not have a specific resonance allowing for binding to many different type atoms such binding could not occur in stars at a sufficient rate enabling them to transfuse lighter atoms into heavier ones. This very precise resonance.. if any different.. would result in no stars and thus no galaxies. This resonance binding force is absolutely required and could not have occurred by happenstance or chance. There are four prime forces in nature. Each is ultra fine tuned andmust be what they are as measured. Any difference in any of these forces or the strength (or instead thought of as weakness) of gravity... and we would not be here. The above... takes an infinitely intelligent and all powerful... God.
K'ssandra Wrote: May 22, 2012 12:05 AM
Not to the bibical literalists, SE -- they would have us believe that each and every word in that book was hand written by god and is 100% factually accurate, no interpretation needed.
Wayne from the Hoosier state Wrote: May 21, 2012 10:33 PM
Mark, The talking serpent was a near human, but without a soul. His punishment resulted in him going on his belly.
nawlins72 Wrote: May 21, 2012 10:17 PM
"The above... takes an infinitely intelligent and all powerful... God."

Original Saepe__Expertus Wrote: May 21, 2012 10:00 PM
Figure of Speech, MARK...Kind of like calling Bill Clinton a PIG.

A lot of cultural commentators are confused these days. They believe that people’s views on same sex marriage are solely a reflection of their religious beliefs. Nothing could be further from the truth. Actually, some things could be further from the truth – like saying that Al Sharpton has integrity or that Dan Savage has class. But you get the point. The same sex marriage debate is about politics. To call it a religious debate is to miss the point entirely. Your stance on same sex marriage should vary depending on whether you consider yourself to be a conservative, a liberal,...