In response to:

"Sharp Disagreement" For Obamacare Ruling

THE_ANSWER Wrote: Jun 16, 2012 6:43 PM
Anne_1 Better that a child become a scientist than a fool. The former is the result of a good education while the latter is more assured.. along with the ill consequences... when a child is made a fool. Which... would you prefer? Few scientists break into homes to steal possessions of others.
Mattieohmalley Wrote: Jun 16, 2012 6:47 PM

Your a despot. Liberty loving people don't a point a gun at their neighbor and tells them how to educate their children.

And only stupid people think Americans would not want their children educated if it wasn't compulsory.

Which is why liberals want education to be compulsory.
GorillasInTheMist Wrote: Jun 16, 2012 6:47 PM
Science as in global warming? You Marxists have managed to politicize even the hard sciences, which is why we will soon have no doctors or any competent people in the scientific world not parroting the virtues of socialism.
Anne_1 Wrote: Jun 16, 2012 6:45 PM
Absolutely a ridiculous comment.

Meaningless and totally irrelevant.

Public school children ten to turn out like you.... and heaven help us
With two more weeks left in June for a ruling on the Obamacare lawsuits, all eyes are on the Supreme Court. Without tipping its hand, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg predicted "sharp disagreement" between the justices in the ruling.

Speaking to a legal conference Friday night in Washington, the oldest member of the high court offered tantalizing hints about where the court may be heading in coming days.

"The term has been more than usually taxing, some have called it the term of the century," she said in remarks at the American Constitution Society's annual review of the...